publication . Preprint . External research report . 2007

The Socioeconomic Determinants of Individual Environmental Concern: Evidence from Shanghai Data

Shen, Junyi; Saijo, Tatsuyoshi;
Open Access
  • Published: 01 Apr 2007
This study examines the influence of socioeconomic characteristics on eleven measures of environmental concern by applying a pooled sample of 1200 individuals in Shanghai, China. Previous studies, which made efforts to explain environmental concern as a function of social structure, suggest that there are traditionally five hypotheses (the age, gender, social class, residence, and political hypotheses) for socioeconomic determinants, which are associated with individual environmental concerns. Unlike those methodologies adopted in many previous studies, we apply an ordered probit model to test three hypotheses (the age, gender, and social class hypotheses) in th...
free text keywords: Socioeconomic determinants, Environmental Concern, Ordered Probit Model, Chinese, jel:C25, jel:C81, jel:Q59
Related Organizations
Download fromView all 2 versions
External research report . 2007
Provider: JAIRO
24 references, page 1 of 2

Adeola, F. O. 1994. Environmental hazards, health, and racial inequity in hazardous waste distribution. Environment and Behavior, 26(1): 99-126.

Antil, J. H. 1984. Socially responsible consumers: Profiles and implications for public policy. Journal of Macromarketing, 19(Fall): 18-39.

Arbuthnot, J. and S. Lingg. 1975. A comparison of French and American environmental behaviors, knowledge and attitudes. International Journal of Psychology, 10: 275-281.

Arcury, T. A. and E. H. Christianson. 1990. Environmental worldview in response to environmental problems: Kentucky 1984 and 1988 compared. Environment and Behavior, 22(3): 387-407.

Buttel, F. H. and W. L. Flinn. 1974. The structure of support for the environmental movement. Rural Sociology, 39: 56-69.

Daneshvary, N., R. Daneshvary, and R. K. Schwer. 1998. Solid-waste recycling behavior and support for curbside textile recycling. Environment and Behavior, 30(2): 144-161.

Davidson, D. J. and W. R. Freudenburg. 1996. Gender and environmental risk concerns. Environment and Behavior, 28(3): 302-339.

Dietz, T., L. Kalof, and P. C. Stern. 2002. Gender, values, and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1): 353-364.

Dunlap, R. E. 1975. The impact of political orientation on environmental attitudes and actions. Environment and Behavior, 7(4): 428-454.

Eagly, A. H. and P. Kulesa. 1997. Attitudes, attitude structure, and resistance to change: Implications for persuasion on environmental issues. In M. H. Bazerman, D. M. Messick, A. E. Tenbrunsel, and K. A. Wade-Benzoni (Eds), Environment, ethics, and behavior: The psychology of environmental valuation and degradation. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.

Fransson, N. and T. G rling. 1999. Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19: 369-382. [OpenAIRE]

Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric analysis. 5th edition, Prentice Hall.

Hackett, P. M. W. 1993. Modeling environmental concern: Theory and application. The Environmentalist, 13(2): 117-120.

Hine, D. W. and R. Gifford. 1991. Fear appeals, individual differences, and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Education, 23(1):36-41.

Howell, S. E. and S. B. Laska. 1992. The changing face of the environmental coalition: A research note. Environment and Behavior, 24(2): 134-144.

24 references, page 1 of 2
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue