publication . Preprint . Article . 2009

Persuasive and Informative Advertising: A Classroom Experiment

Beth A. Freeborn; Jason P. Hulbert;
Open Access
  • Published: 11 Jun 2009
This paper outlines a pair of classroom activities designed to provide an intuitive foundation to the theoretical introduction of advertising in monopoly markets. The roles of both informative and persuasive advertising are covered. Each student acts as a monopolist and chooses the number of (costly) advertisements and price. The experiments are intended for intermediate microeconomics or industrial organization courses, though may be utilized in any course that covers advertising models.
ACM Computing Classification System: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
free text keywords: Classroom experiment, Advertising, Monopolist, Undergraduate Industrial Organization, Economics and Econometrics, Education, jel:A22, jel:C90, jel:D21, jel:L10, Advertising research, Monopoly, Persuasive advertising, Economics, Advertising, Economics education, Informative advertising, Marketing
19 references, page 1 of 2

Ackerberg, Daniel (2001). “Empirically Distinguishing Informative and Prestige Effects of Advertising,” RAND Journal of Economics, 33(2): 100-118.

Ackerberg, Daniel (2003). “Advertising, Learning, and Consumer Choice in Experience Good Markets: A Structural Empirical Examination,” International Economic Review, 44(3): 1007- 1040.

Avery, Rosemary, Donald Kenkel, Dean Lillard, and Alan Mathios (2007). “Private Profits and Public Health: Does Advertising of Smoking Cessation Products Encourage Smokers to Quit?” Journal of Political Economy, 115(3): 447-481.

Badasyan, Narine, Jacob K. Goeree, Monica Hartmann, Charles Holt, John Morgan, Tanya Rosenblat, Maros Servatka, and Dirk Yandell (2005). “Vertical Integration of Successive Monopolists: A Classroom Experiment.” Perspectives on Economic Education Research, forthcoming.

Basuchoudhary, Atin, Christopher Metcalf, Kai Pommerenke, David Reiley, Christian Rojas, Marzena Rostek, and James Stodder (2008). “Price Discrimination and Resale: A Classroom Experiment.” Journal of Economic Education, 39(3): 229-244.

Cabral, Luis M. B. (2000). Introduction to Industrial Organization, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Capra, C. Monica, Jacob K. Goeree, Rosario Gomez, Charles A. Holt (2000). “Predation, Asymmetric Information and Strategic Behvaior in the Classroom: An Experimental Approach to the Teaching of Industrial Organization.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18: 205-225. [OpenAIRE]

Carlton, Dennis W. and Jeffrey M. Perloff (2005). Modern Industrial Organization, Fourth Edition. U.S.A.: Pearson Addison-Wesley.

Clark, C. Robert (2007). “Advertising Restrictions and Competition in the Children's Breakfast Cereal Industry,” Journal of Law and Economics, 50: 757-780.

Dickie, Mark (2006). “Do Classroom Experiments Increase Learning in Introductory Microeconomics.” Journal of Economic Education, 37(3): 267-288.

Dixit, Avinash and Victor Norman (1978). “Advertising and Welfare.” The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(1): 1-17.

Durham, Yvonne, Thomas McKinnon, and Craig Schulman (2007). “Classroom Experiments: Not Just Fun and Games,” Economic Inquiry. 45(1): 162-178.

Emerson, Tisha L. N. and Beck A. Taylor (2004). “Comparing Student Achievement across Experimental and Lecture-Oriented Sections of a Principles of Microeconomics Course,” Southern Economic Journal. 70(3): 672-693. [OpenAIRE]

Frank, Bjorn (1997). “The Impact of Classroom Experiments on the Learning of Economics: An Empirical Investigation,” Economic Inquiry. 35(4): 763-69.

Gächter, Simon, Christian Thöni, and Jean-Robert Tyran (2006). “Cournot Competition and Hitand-Run Entry in a Teaching Experiment.” Journal of Economic Education, 37(4): 418-430.

19 references, page 1 of 2
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue