Biological Innovation and Productivity Growth in the Antebellum Cotton Economy

Preprint OPEN
Alan L. Olmstead ; Paul W. Rhode (2008)
  • Subject:
    • jel: jel:N5 | jel:J43 | jel:N11 | jel:O3

The Cliometrics literature on slave efficiency has generally focused on static questions. We take a decidedly more dynamic approach. Drawing on the records of 142 plantations with 509 crops years, we show that the average daily cotton picking rate increased about four-fold between 1801 and 1862. We argue that the development and diffusion of new cotton varieties were the primary sources of the increased efficiency. These finding have broad implications for understanding the South's preeminence in the world cotton market, the pace of westward expansion, and the importance of indigenous technological innovation.
  • References (34)
    34 references, page 1 of 4

    1829.37 We know that Mexican cotton was still a novelty in Alabama in 1826 because David Moore, Manuscript, Archives and Rare Book Library, Emory University (Atlanta, GA).

    Graves Family. Papers, 1818-1939 (bulk 1836-1910). Coll. 327.

    Caleb Coker (1802-1869) Plantation Book, 1856-1861. RASP, Ser. A, pt. 2, reel 3.

    James D. Trezevant Plantation Diary and Records, 1845-1858. RASP, Ser. A, pt. 2, reel 3.

    Mary Hart Means (1835-1916) Papers, 1846-1865. RASP, Ser. A, pt. 2, reel 4.

    Papers of James Henry Hammond, 1795-1865. RASP, Ser. A, pt. 1, reels 1-15.

    Samuel Porcher Gaillard (1811-1880) Plantation Journals, 1835-1871. RASP, Ser. A, pt. 2, reels 1-2.

    Thomas Cassels Law (1811-1888) Papers, 1810-1865. RASP, Ser. A, pt. 2, reels 7-8.

    Duncan and Dugal McCall Plantation Journals, 1832-1854. RASP, Ser. F, pt. 1, reels 4-5.

    Haller Nutt Papers, 1846-1860, and Journal of Araby Plantation, 1843-1850. RASP, Ser. F, pt. 1, reel 1-2.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark