Stochastic dominance for law invariant preferences: The happy story of elliptical distributions

Preprint OPEN
Matteo Del Vigna (2012)
  • Subject: Stochastic dominance, Cumulative Prospect Theory, Elliptical distributions, Mean-Variance analysis.
    • jel: jel:D03 | jel:G11 | jel:D81

We study the connections between stochastic dominance and law invariant preferences. Whenever the functional that represents preferences depends only on the law of the random variable, we shall look for conditions that imply a ranking of distributions. In analogy with the Expected Utility paradigm, we prove that functional dominance leads to first order stochastic dominance. We analyze in details the case of Dual Theory of Choice and Cumulative Prospect Theory, including all its distinctive features such as S-shaped value function, reversed S-shaped probability distortions and loss aversion. These cases can be seen as special examples of a more general scheme. We find necessary and sufficient conditions that imply preferences to depend only on the mean and variance of the lottery. Our main result is a characterization of such distributions that imply Mean-Variance preferences, namely the elliptical ones. In particular, we prove that under mild assumptions over the reference wealth, the prospect value of a portfolio depends only on its mean and variance if and only if the random assets' return are elliptically distributed. The analysis is of particular relevance for optimal portfolio choice, mutual fund separation and Capital Asset Pricing equilibria.
  • References (38)
    38 references, page 1 of 4

    [1] N. Barberis and M. Huang (2008): Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices. The American Economic Review , 98(5), 2066-2100.

    [2] M. Baucells and F.H. Heukamp (2006): Stochastic Dominance and Cumulative Prospect Theory. Management Science , 52(9), 1409-1423.

    [3] C. Bernard and M. Ghossoub (2010): Static portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory. Mathematics and nancial economics , 2(4), 277-306.

    [4] L. Campi and M. Del Vigna (2012): Weak Insider Trading and Behavioral Finance. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics , 3(1), 242-279.

    [6] D. Cass and J. Stiglitz (1970): The Structure of Investor Preferences and Asset Returns, and Separability in Portfolio Allocation. Journal of Economic Theory , 2, 122-160.

    [7] G. Chamberlain (1983): A Characterization of the Distributions That Imply Mean-Variance Utility Functions. Journal of Economic Theory , 29, 185-201.

    [8] E.G. De Giorgi, T. Hens and H. Levy (2011): CAPM equilibria with prospect theory preferences. Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=420184.

    [9] E.G. De Giorgi, T. Hens and H. Levy (2012): Two Paradigms and Nobel Prizes in Economics: a Contradiction or Coexistence? European Financial Management , 18(2), 163-182.

    [10] E.G. De Giorgi, T. Hens and M.O. Rieger (2010): Financial market equilibria with cumulative prospect theory. Journal of Mathematical Economics , 46, 633-651.

    [12] E. Diecidue and P.P. Wakker (2001): On the intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 23(3), 281-298.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark