Constructing Quality Adjusted Price Indexes: a Comparison of Hedonic and Discrete Choice Models

Preprint OPEN
N. Jonker (2001)
  • Subject: logit models; cpi; consumenter behaviour; producer behaviour
    • jel: jel:D11 | jel:D21 | jel:C43 | jel:C25

The Boskin report (1996) concluded that the US consumer price index (CPI) overestimated the inflation by 1.1 percentage points. This was due to several measurement errors in the CPI. One of them is called quality change bias. In this paper two methods are compared which can be used to eliminate quality change bias, namely the hedonic method and a method based on the use of discrete choice models. The underlying micro-economic fundations of the two methods are compared as well as their empirical implementation. Although the discrete choice model has not often been used in order to calculate quality adjusted price indexes it seems to be quite promising to do so.
  • References (5)

    Cramer, J.S., 1966, Een prijsindex van nieuwe personenauto's, 1950-1965, Statistica Neerlandica, vol. 20(2), 215-224.

    Cropper, M.L. et al., 1993, Valuing product attributes using single market data: a comparison of hedonic and discrete choice approaches, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 75, 225-232.

    Diewert, W.E., 1976, Exact and superlative index numbers, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 4, 115-145.

    Diewert, W.E., 1987, Index numbers in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 2, J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds.), The Macmillan Press, London, 767-780.

    Diewert, W.E., 2001, Hedonic Regressions: A Consumer Theory Approach, Discussion paper no. 01- 12, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark