Vertical integration and the licensing of innovation with a fixed fee or a royalty

Preprint OPEN
Lemarié, S.;
    • jel: jel:D45 | jel:L22 | jel:L42 | jel:O32 | jel:O31

In this paper, we analyse a situation where a patent holder is considered as an upstream firm that can license its innovation to some downstream companies that compete on a final market with differentiated products. Licensing contract may be based either on a royalty or... View more
  • References (25)
    25 references, page 1 of 3

    A. Arora, A. Fosfuri, and A. Gambardella. Markets for technology. MIT Press, 2002.

    K. J. Arrow. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson, editor, The rate and direction of inventive activity : economic and social factors, pages 609-626. Princeton Universtity Press, Princeton (USA), 1962.

    E. Avenel and S. Caprice. Vertical integration, exclusive dealing and product line differentiation in retailing. Cahier de recherche 2003-11, INRA, 2003.

    A. Bousquet, H. Cremer, M. Ivaldi, and M. Wolkowicz. Risk sharing in licensing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16(5):535554, 1998.

    F. Caballero-Sanz, Moner-Colonques, and J. J. Sempere-Monerris. Optimal licensing in a spatial model. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, 66:257-279, 2002.

    R. E. Caves, H. Crookell, and J. P. Killing. The imperfect market for technology licenses. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 45(3):249-267, 1983.

    C. Erutku and Y. Richelle. Optimal licensing contracts and the value of a patent. working paper 2000-07, Universit´e de Montr´eal, 2000.

    R. Faul´ı-Oller and J. Sandon´ıs. To merge or to license: implications for competition policy. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(5):607-759, 2003.

    N. Gallini and B. Wright. Technology transfer under asymmetric information. Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1):147-160, 1990.

    R. Jensen and M. Thursby. Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review, 91(1):240-259, 2001.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark