Competing for Influencers in a Social Network

Preprint OPEN
Zsolt Katona;
  • Subject: Social Networks, Influencers, Competition
    • jel: jel:D44 | jel:M31 | jel:C72

This paper studies the competition between firms for influencers in a network. Firms spend effort to convince influencers to recommend their products. The analysis identifies the offensive and defensive roles of spending on influencers. The value of an influencer only d... View more
  • References (10)

    Amaldoss, Wilfred, Chuan He. 2010. Product Variety, Informative Advertising, and Price Competition. Journal of Marketing Research 47(1) 146{156.

    Katona, Zsolt, Peter Zubcsek, Miklos Sarvary. 2011. Network e ects and personal in uences: Di usion of an online social network. Journal of Marketing Research 48(3) 425{443.

    Kempe, David, Jon Kleinberg, Eva Tardos. 2003. Maximizing the spread of in uence through a social network. Proceedings of KDD 2003 . Washington, DC, 137{146.

    Mayzlin, Dina. 2002. The in uence of social networks on the e ectiveness of promotional strategies. Working Paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

    Nair, Harikesh, Puneet Manchanda, Tulikaa Bhatia. 2010. Asymmetric peer e ects in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. Journal of Marketing Research 47(5) 883{ 895.

    Narasimhan, C. 1988. Competitive promotional strategies. Journal of Business 61(4) 427{449.

    Trusov, Michael, Anand V. Bodapati, Randolph E. Bucklin. 2010. Determining in uential users in internet social networks. Journal of Marketing Research 47(4) 643{658.

    Tucker, Catherine. 2008. Identifying formal and informal in uence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Science 54(12) 2024{2038.

    Tullock, G. 1980. Towards a Theory of Rent-Seeking Society, J. Buchanan, R. Tollison and G. Tullock (eds.), chap. E cient Rent Seeking. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, 176{202.

    Van den Bulte, Cristophe, Gary L. Lilien. 2001. Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing e ort. American Journal of Sociology 106(5) 1409{1435.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark