publication . Preprint . 2012

Endogenising Detection in an Asymmetric Penalties Corruption Game

Dominic Spengler;
Open Access
  • Published: 01 Jul 2012
Abstract
We construct a one-shot corruption game with three players, a briber who can decide to bribe or not, an official who can reciprocate or not and an inspector who can decide to inspect or not. We employ four penalties that can be distributed asymmetrically, making it possible to punish bribing and bribe-taking as well as reciprocating and accepting considerations to different degrees. Penalties apply if corruption is detected. The probability of detection is endogenised, as it depends on inspection. The model differs from other inspection games in that the offence (corruption) can only be completed in a joint effort between two of the players. This leads to surpri...
Subjects
free text keywords: Inspection game, Corruption, Asymmetric penalties, Endogenising detection, jel:K42, jel:H00, jel:C72, jel:O17
24 references, page 1 of 2

Aidt, Toke S. 2003. Economic analysis of corruption: a survey*. The Economic Journal, 113(491):F632-F652. [OpenAIRE]

Andreozzi, Luciano 2004. Rewarding policemen increases crime. Another surprising result from the inspection game. Public Choice, 121:69-82.

Basu, Kaushik 2011. Why, for a Class of Bribes, the Act of Giving a Bribe should be Treated as Legal.

Basu, Kaushik, Ajit Mishra, & Sudipto Bhattacharya 1992. Notes on bribery corruption and the control of. Journal of Public Economics, 48:349-359.

Becker, Gary S. 1968. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2):169.

Besley, Timothy, & John Mclaren 1993. Taxes and Bribery : The Role of Wage Incentives. The Economic Journal, 103(416):119-141.

Bianco, W.T., P.C. Ordeshook, & G. Tsebelis 1990. Crime and Punishment: Are OneShot, Two-Person Games Enough? American Political Science Review, 84(2):569- 586.

Cox, Gary W. 1994. A note on crime and punishment. Public Choice, 78(1):115-124.

Dionne, G., F. Giuliano, & P. Picard 2009. Optimal Auditing with Scoring: Theory and Application to Insurance Fraud. Management Science, 55(1):58-70. [OpenAIRE]

Engel, Christoph, Sebastian J. Goerg, & Gaoneng Yu 2012. Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Punishment Regimes for Bribery. SSRN Electronic Journal. [OpenAIRE]

Friehe, Tim 2008. Correlated payoffs in the inspection game: some theory and an application to corruption. Public Choice, 137(1-2):127-143.

Graetz, Michael J, Jennifer F Reinganum, Louis L Wilde, Jules Coleman, & Alvin Klevorick 1986. The Tax Compliance Gane : Toward an Interactive Theory of Law Enforcement. Spring, 1(1):1-32.

Jain, Arvind K. 2001. Corruption: A Review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1):71- 121.

Lambsdorff, Johann Graf 2007. The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform: Theory, Evidence and Policy, volume 51. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge. [OpenAIRE]

Lambsdorff, Johann Graf, & Mathias Nell 2007. Fighting Corruption with Asymmetric Penalties and Leniency. [OpenAIRE]

24 references, page 1 of 2
Powered by OpenAIRE Open Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue