publication . Preprint . 2014

Adam Smith's Concept of Labour: Value or Measure?

Adolfo Rodriguez-Herrera;
Open Access
  • Published: 01 Jun 2014
The terminology employed by Smith to refer to value and measure of value is used in his time with imprecision, which has led to different interpretations about his position on these issues. It is no coincidence that Smith is considered the father of the labour theory of value developed by David Ricardo and Karl Marx and simultaneously of the cost-of-production theory of value developed by John Stuart Mill and Alfred Marshall. This paper reviews the concepts developed by Smith to formulate his theory of value –value, real price and exchangeable value– and the criticism made by Ricardo and Marx on Smith’s position about the role of labour as measure of value. Acco...

[1] Franklin Benjamin [1719], A modest inquiry into the nature and necessity of a paper currency, en Jared Sparks (ed) The Works of Benjamin Franklin, Wittemore, Niles and Hall, volume 2, Boston, 1856.

[2] Mark Blaug [1962], Economic Theory in Retrospect, Cambridge University Press, 4th ed, London, 1992.

[3] Hollander Samuel. The economics of Adam Smith. Heinemann Educational Books, Canada, 1973.

[4] Hollander Samuel [1987]. Classical Economics. Basil Blackwell, Canada, 1992.

[5] Marx Karl [1861-1863]. Theories of Surplus-Value, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1978, Part I.

[3] Marx Karl [1867]. Capital, Volume I, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow, 1959.

[6] Meek Ronald L. [1957]. Studies in the Labour Theory of Value, Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1973.

[7] Ricardo David [1817]. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Piero Sraffa (editor), The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Volume 1, Cambridge University Press, London, 1990.

[8] Robbins Lionel [1980]. A History of Economic Thought. The LSE Lectures. Princeton University Press, Oxford, 2000.

[9] Smith Adam [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Glasgow Edition, Liberty Fund Inc, USA, 1981.

Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue