publication . Article . 2015

Effects of a six-session introductory psychology programme on Year 9 pupils' interest in psychology and approaches to learning

Norris, E; Chaves, TDA; Dunsmuir, S;
Open Access English
  • Published: 01 Jan 2015
  • Publisher: British Psychological Society
  • Country: United Kingdom
Psychology is a popular UK A-level, despite many pupils having no previous taught experience of it. Prior introduction to psychology teaching could help pupils make more informed choices to study it. This study evaluates a six-session introduction to psychology programme for 20 Year 9 pupils called ‘Myth-Busting the Brain’. A pre-/post-programme questionnaire investigated pupil interest towards future psychology study, interest in the programme and approaches to learning. There was no significant difference between timepoints in interest in psychology, nor the programme itself between pre-and post-programme assessment. Overall interest in psychology was signific...
free text keywords: Widening participation; pre-university teaching; attitudes to psychology study., widening participation, pre-university teaching, attitudes to psychology study
19 references, page 1 of 2

Achievement for All. (2015). University Learning in Schools Retrieved 14th April 2015, from

Banyard, P. (2014). What is happening to A-level psychology? The Psychologist, 27, 936-939.

Boneau, C. A. (1990). Psychological literacy: A first approximation. American psychologist, 45(7), 891. [OpenAIRE]

Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109-138.

Coe, R., Searle, J., Barmby, P., Jones, K., & Higgins, S. (2008). Relative difficulty of examinations in different subjects. Durham University: CEM Centre.

Conway, M., & Banister, P. (2007). High quality science A-level: Good for students, universities and the discipline. The Psychologist, 20(608-609).

Department for Education. (2012). National Curriculum Teacher Assessments at Key Stage 3 Retrieved 12th April 2015, from r25-2012ks3.pdf

Department for Education. (2014). School performance tables, from

Geake, J. (2008). Neuromythologies in education. Educational Research, 50(2), 123-133. [OpenAIRE]

Goswami, U. (2006). Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? [10.1038/nrn1907]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 7(5), 406-413.

Halonen, J. S., Bosack, T., Clay, S., McCarthy, M., Dunn, D. S., Hill, G. W., . . . Weaver, K. A. (2003). A rubric for learning, teaching, and assessing scientific inquiry in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30(3), 196-208.

Higton, J., Noble, J., Pope, S., Boal, N., Ginnis, S., Donaldson, R., & Greevy, H. (2012). Fit for purpose? : the view of the higher education sector, teachers and employers on the suitability of A levels. Coventry: Ofqual.

Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. [Perspectives]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 15(12), 817-824. doi: 10.1038/nrn3817

Hulme, J. (2014). Psychological literacy - from classroom to real world. The Psychologist, 27, 932-935.

Jarrett, C. (2015). Great Myths of the Brain. Chichester: Wiley.

19 references, page 1 of 2
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue