publication . Master thesis . 2002

Process and representation in multiple-cue judgment

Olsson, Anna-Carin;
Open Access English
  • Published: 01 Jan 2002
  • Publisher: Umeå universitet, Psykologi
  • Country: Sweden
Abstract
This thesis investigates the cognitive processes and representations underlying human judgment in a multiple-cue judgment task. Several recent models assume that people have several qualitatively distinct and competing levels of knowledge representations (Ashby, Alfonso-Reese, Turken, & Waldron, 1998; Erickson & Kruschke, 1998; Nosofsky, Palmeri, & McKinley, 1994; Sloman, 1996). The most successful cognitive models in categorization and multiple-cue judgment are, respectively, exemplar-based models and rule-based models. Study 1 investigated if the different theoretical conclusions in categorization and multiple-cue judgment derive from genuine diffe...
Subjects
free text keywords: Psychology, Psykologi
Related Organizations
70 references, page 1 of 5

t 57

e56

jndg5545

eM53 Exp

Andersson, J. (1996). Two is one too many: Dyadic memory collaboration effects on encoding and retrieval of episodes. Ph. D. Thesis, Linköping University, Sweden.

Andersson, J. (2001). Net effect of memory collaboration: How is collaboration affected by factors such as friendship, gender and age? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 367-375.

Ariely, D., Bender, R. H., Dietz C. B., Gu, H., Wallsten, T. S., & Zauberman, 2001. The effects of averaging subjective probability estimates between and within judges. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 130-147.

Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442-481.

Ashby, F. G., & Ell, S. W. (2001). The neurobiology of human category learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 204-210. [OpenAIRE]

Brehmer, B. (1994). The psychology of linear judgment models. Acta Psychologica, 87, 137-154.

Brown, R. (1988). Group processes. Dynamics within and between groups. Oxford: Basic Blackwell.

Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: John Wiley.

Budescu, D. V., & Rantilla, A. K. (2000). Confidence in aggregation of expert opinions. Acta Psychologica, 104, 371-398. [OpenAIRE]

Cooksey, R. W. (1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods, and applications. Academic Press: San Diego.

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 1-73. [OpenAIRE]

70 references, page 1 of 5
Powered by OpenAIRE Open Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue