You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
3. Academic Publishing
3. Academic Publishing
International audience
ACM Computing Classification System: ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
[INFO.INFO-DL]Computer Science [cs]/Digital Libraries [cs.DL]
[INFO.INFO-DL]Computer Science [cs]/Digital Libraries [cs.DL]
ACM Computing Classification System: ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
2613
Anderson, Sheila, 'What are Research Infrastructures', International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 7.1-2 (2013), 4-23, https://doi.org/10.3366/ ijhac.2013.0078
Cheverie, Joan, Jennifer Boettcher, and John Buschman, 'Digital Scholarship in the University Tenure and Promotion Process: A Report on the Sixth Scholarly Communication Symposium at Georgetown University Library', Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 40.3 (2009), 219-30, https://doi.org/10.3138/ jsp.40.3.219
Crossick, Geoffrey, Monographs and Open Access: A Report to HEFCE (London: HEFCE, 2015), https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/21921/1/2014_monographs.pdf
Curran, Mark, 'Beyond the Forbidden Best-Sellers of Pre-Revolutionary France', The Historical Journal, 56.1 (2013), 89-112, https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0018246x12000556
Darnton, Robert, 'Review of The French Book Trade in Enlightenment Europe, 1769-1794', Reviews in History (December 2012), http://www.history.ac.uk/ reviews/review/1355
DeCoursey, Tom, 'The Pros and Cons of Open Peer Review', Nature (2006), https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04991 [OpenAIRE]
Denbo, Seth, 'Draft Guidelines on the Evaluation of Digital Scholarship', American Historical Association (21 April 2015), http://blog.historians. org/2015/04/draft-guidelines-evaluation-digital-scholarship/
Else, Holly, 'Dutch Publishing Giant Cuts off Researchers in Germany and Sweden', Nature, 559 (2018), 454-55, https://www.nature.com/articles/ d41586-018-05754-1
Engels, Tim C. E., et al., 'Are Book Publications Disappearing from Scholarly Communication in the Social Sciences and Humanities?', Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70.6 (2018), 592-607, https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM05-2018-0127
Estelle, Lorraine, 'What Researchers Told Us about their Experiences and Expectations of Scholarly Communications Ecosystems', Insights, 30.1 (2017), 71-75, https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.349
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Popularity provided by BIP!International audience