
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Deliverable D3.1 Report on Historical Data as Sources
Deliverable D3.1 Report on Historical Data as Sources
- Université Paris Diderot France
[SHS.STAT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statistics, [SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, [SHS.MUSEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Cultural heritage and museology
[SHS.STAT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Methods and statistics, [SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, [SHS.MUSEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Cultural heritage and museology
Berry, D.M. (2011). “The Computational Turn: thinking about the digital humanities,” Culture Machine, vol. 12, 2011, pp.1-22.
Bolin, G. and Schwarz, J.A. (2015) “Heuristics of the algorithm: Big Data, user interpretation and institutional translation,” Big Data & Society, vol. 4, July-Dec. 2015, pp. 1-12.
Borgman, C.L. (2015). “Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world”. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
boyd, d. and Crawford, K. (2012) “Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon,” Information, Communication, & Society, vol. 15, May 2012, pp. 662-679.
Broadfield, A. (1946). The Philosophy of Classification, London: Grafton.
Brothman, B. (1991). “Orders of Values: Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice”, Archivaria 32.82.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!

- Funder: European Commission (EC)
- Project Code: 732340
- Funding stream: H2020 | RIA