You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Dalla crisi della comunicazione scientifica alle strategie Open Access: nuovi modelli di circolazione del sapere
Dalla crisi della comunicazione scientifica alle strategie Open Access: nuovi modelli di circolazione del sapere
The "serial pricing crisis" that has hit the Scholarly Communication system generated a great deal of initiatives and projects designed to transform radically the ways in which knowledge circulates. The first reaction to this crisis was new forms of cooperation between libraries which led to the creation of consortia for the shared purchasing of electronic resources. The academic community, resorting to sustainable electronic Publishing and Open Access to scientific literature, then sought new channels of communication able to satisfy the demand for widespread and rapid circulation of ideas and research findings. Open models of scientific communication achieved by the two strategies of "Open Access Publishing" and "Open Access Self-Archiving" represent an innovative approach that is capable of guaranteeing the dissemination of research literature. Some Open Access Journals, a new generation of freely accessible electronic periodicals, are already acclaimed. However, the affordability of their business model and their financial and other repercussions has generated a lively debate that still rages within the international community involved in the evolution of new models of Scholarly Communication.
author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access. [ED. Intellectual property], BG. Information dissemination and diffusion., HR. Portals., HS. Repositories., HN. e-journals.
author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access. [ED. Intellectual property], BG. Information dissemination and diffusion., HR. Portals., HS. Repositories., HN. e-journals.
4815
Branin, Joseph J., Case, Mary, Reforming scholarly publishing in the sciences: a librarian perspective,” Notices of the AMS”, 4(1998),
Brown, Patrick, PloS co-founder defends free dissemination of peer-reviewed journals online, “Nature Web Focus: Access to the Literature”, 19 marzo 2004, <http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/5.html>
Butler, Declan, Scientific publishing: Who will pay for open access?, “Nature”, 425, 9 ottobre 2003, < http://www.nature.com/cgitaf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v425/n6958/full/425554a_r.html& filetype=&dynoptions=> Casati, Roberto, Il progetto Soros, “Il Sole 24 ore”, 17 febbraio
Case, Mary, Scholarly Communication: a system in crisis, “The Ohio State University Libraries”, 25 settembre 2001, <http://www.lib.ohio-state.edu/Staff/scholcom/case925.html>
De Robbio, Antonella, Gli Archivi e-prints in Italia, “Bibliotime”, 7(2004), 1, <http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00001168/>
- Auto-archiviazione per la ricerca: problemi aperti e sviluppi futuri, “Bibliotime”,VI(2003), 3,
<http://www.spbo.unibo.it/bibliotime/num-vi-3/derobbio.htm>
- Chi ha creato il primo circuito per la distribuzione e lo scambio di preprint?, “Bibliotime”, VII(2002), 2, <http://www.spbo.unibo.it/bibliotime/num-vii-2/derobbio.htm>
- E-LIS: un open archive in Library and Information Science, “Bibliotime”, VI(2003), 1 “AIB Notizie” 15(2003), 2, <http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00002154/>
- Evoluzione e rivoluzione dei periodici elettronici, “Bibliotime”, 3(2001), 1, <http://www.spbo.unibo.it/bibliotime/num-iii1/derobbio.htm>
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!- Wellcome Trust (WT)
The "serial pricing crisis" that has hit the Scholarly Communication system generated a great deal of initiatives and projects designed to transform radically the ways in which knowledge circulates. The first reaction to this crisis was new forms of cooperation between libraries which led to the creation of consortia for the shared purchasing of electronic resources. The academic community, resorting to sustainable electronic Publishing and Open Access to scientific literature, then sought new channels of communication able to satisfy the demand for widespread and rapid circulation of ideas and research findings. Open models of scientific communication achieved by the two strategies of "Open Access Publishing" and "Open Access Self-Archiving" represent an innovative approach that is capable of guaranteeing the dissemination of research literature. Some Open Access Journals, a new generation of freely accessible electronic periodicals, are already acclaimed. However, the affordability of their business model and their financial and other repercussions has generated a lively debate that still rages within the international community involved in the evolution of new models of Scholarly Communication.