Found an issue? Give us feedback

eSkripsi Universitas...arrow_drop_down

eSkripsi Universitas Andalas

Thesis . 2019

Data sources: eSkripsi Universitas Andalas

Select content type to embed

All Research products

arrow_drop_down

<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Claim

Political efficacy dan penerapan prinsip demokrasi deliberatif masyarakat adat minangkabau. studi kasus LKAAM Kota Solok

Name: Political efficacy dan penerapan prinsip demokrasi deliberatif masyarakat adat minangkabau. studi kasus LKAAM Kota Solok
Creator: Yuyut, Candra
Keywords: JF Political institutions (General), JA Political science (General)

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Thesis 14 Nov 2019 Indonesia Indonesian

Authors: Yuyut, Candra;

Political efficacy dan penerapan prinsip demokrasi deliberatif masyarakat adat minangkabau. studi kasus LKAAM Kota Solok

- Summary
- Subjects
- References
  (16)
- Metrics

Abstract

Democracy deliberately changes government policy through argumentative discussion. The characteristics of deliberative democracy have instrumental and intrinsic value. The instrumental value of deliberative democracy enables it to better solve the problems of modern governance, while its intrinsic value enables it to produce citizens who are better and more capable in supporting politics. The Natural Minangkabau Natural Density Institute (LKAAM) Solok City is an institution that helps the Solok City government in formulating public policies through argumentative discussions. This research describes how the implementation of deliberative democratic principles of the Minangkabau people and seek the correlation with political efficacy. This research uses mixed methods of qualitative and quantitative. The goal is to be able to receive data that discusses the object being discussed. Both of these methods discuss about being equal because there is nothing dominant between the two. Qualitatively related to see the phenomena of the process of implementing deliberative democracy and quantitative to see the relationship of political efficacy with the implementation of the principle of deliberative democracy. The process of implementing the principles of deliberative democracy LKAAM Solok City represents indigenous peoples who give authority to customary leaders to bridge the interests of the community with the government and vice versa. LKAAM Solok City also issued a criticism issued by the Solok City Government. The relationship between political efficacy and democratic commitment is non-existent and insignificant. This is done by the interaction variable with the other LKAAM not done by all members of the Solok City LKAAM. Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson only. Keywords: Democracy, Deliberative Democracy, Political Efficacy, LKAAM,

Country

Indonesia

Related Organizations

Keywords

JF Political institutions (General), JA Political science (General)

16 references, page 1 of 2

Finkel, Steven E. (1985). Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Efficacy: A Panel Analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4): 891-913.

Fishkin, J. (2008). Pluralism , Diversity , and Deliberation Deliberative Democracy. The Blackwell Guide to Social and Political Philosophy.

Fishkin, J. S. (2009). When The People SPeak.

Fitriah, E. A. (2014). Personal Values Dan Internal Political Efficacy Pemula. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 1(2), 244-254.

Fung, Archon and Erik Olin Wright (eds.) (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. New York, NY: Verso.

Gil De Zuniga, Homero. Diehl, Trevor. Ardevol-Abreu, Alberto. (2017). Internal, External, and Government Poliical Efficacy: Effects of News Use, Discussion, and Political Participation. Jurnal of Broadcasting and Elecronic Media. Routledge Tailor and Francis Group.

Gutmann, Amy and Dennis Thompson (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Habermas, Jürgen (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Himmelross, Staffan. Rapeli, Lauri. Gronlund, Kimmo. (2016). Talking With The Like-Minden People- Equality and Efficacy in Enclave Deliberation. Social Science Journal.

Ikeda Ken'ichi, Kobayashi Tetsuro, Hoshimoto Maasa. 2008. Does political participation make a difference? The relationship between political choice, civic engagement and political efficacy. Electoral Studies journal. No 1. Vol 29. pp 77-88

chevron_left
1
2
chevron_right

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

BIP!

Found an issue? Give us feedback

Average