You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Open Research Data and Innovative Scholarly Writing: OPERAS highlights
Open Research Data and Innovative Scholarly Writing: OPERAS highlights
International audience; Published in OA on RESSI (http://www.ressi.ch/) at the end of Octobre 2021. We present here highlights from an enquiry on the innovations in scholarly writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences in the H2020 project OPERAS-P. This article explores the theme of Open Research Data and its role in the emergence of new models of scholarly writing. We examine more closely the obstacles and fostering conditions to the publication of research data, both from a social and a technical perspective.
- UNIVERSITE PARIS DESCARTES France
- Université Paris Diderot France
Scholarly communication, Humanities, H2020, OPERAS, DARIAH, scholarly writing, innovation, academic publishing, [SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, OPERAS, Open Research Data, Social Sciences, Academic publishing, DARIAH-EU, Scholarly writing, Innovation, [SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences
Scholarly communication, Humanities, H2020, OPERAS, DARIAH, scholarly writing, innovation, academic publishing, [SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, OPERAS, Open Research Data, Social Sciences, Academic publishing, DARIAH-EU, Scholarly writing, Innovation, [SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences
3414
[1] Andrews, T. (2017, video). After the Spring: Digital forms of scholarship and the publication ecosystem [Conference Keynote] (26.09.17). 20th International Conference on Electronic Publishing Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas. 7-9 June 2016 in Göttingen, Germany, Göttingen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44FaPFjYxMk
[2] Angelaki, G., Badzmierowska, K., Brown, D., Chiquet, V., Colla, J., Finlay-McAlester, J., Grabowska, K. et al. “How to Facilitate Cooperation between Humanities Researchers and Cultural Heritage Institutions. Guidelines.” Digital Humanities Centre at the Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, 10 March 2019. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2587481.
[3] Baillot, A. (2016, conference communication). A certification model for digital scholarly editions: Towards peer review-based data journals in the humanities. Conference communication. Digital Scholarly Editing: Theory, Practice, Methods, Université d'Anvers, Oct 2016, Anvers, Belgium, https://halshs.archivesouvertes.fr/halshs-01392880 [OpenAIRE]
[4] Barats, C., Fickers, A., & Schafer, V. (2020), Fading Away... The challenge of sustainability in digital studies. Digital Humanities Quarterly 14 (03), http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/14/3/000484/000484.html
[5] Chavan, V., & Penev, L. (2011). The data paper: A mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science. BMC Bioinformatics, 12(S15), S2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S15-S2
[6] DAE03: Tóth-Czifra, E. (2020). Transcript Interview DAE03 (H2020 OPERAS-P). [Text] Nakala. https://doi.org/10.34847/nkl.3e9bjm89
[7] Eve, M. P. (2020). Violins in the Subway: Scarcity Correlations, Evaluative Cultures, and Disciplinary Authority in the Digital Humanities. In: Edmond, Jennifer (ed.) Digital Technology and the Practices of Humanities Research. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 105-22.
[8] Fauchié, A. (2016, blog post). Le livre web, une autre forme du livre numérique (24.10.16). Quaternum.Net, https://www.quaternum.net/2016/10/24/le-livre-web-une-autre-forme-du-livre-numerique/
[9] Fitzpatrick, K. (2011). Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. NYU Press; JSTOR. www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qg9mh
[10] Frydman, G. (2009), “e-Patients Demand: Put An End To Data-Hugging Disorder” (04.06.09), Society for Participatory Medicine. Transforming the Culture of Patient Care Blog.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Popularity provided by BIP!- UNIVERSITE PARIS DESCARTES France
- Université Paris Diderot France
International audience; Published in OA on RESSI (http://www.ressi.ch/) at the end of Octobre 2021. We present here highlights from an enquiry on the innovations in scholarly writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences in the H2020 project OPERAS-P. This article explores the theme of Open Research Data and its role in the emergence of new models of scholarly writing. We examine more closely the obstacles and fostering conditions to the publication of research data, both from a social and a technical perspective.