
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Measurement of singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays → , , And
Measurement of singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays → , , And
Using a data sample of e+e− collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.93 fb−1 collected with the BESIII detector at a center-of-mass energy of s=3.773GeV, we search for the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays D0→π0π0π0, π0π0η, π0ηη and ηηη using the double tag method. The absolute branching fractions are measured to be B(D0→π0π0π0)=(2.0±0.4±0.3)×10−4, B(D0→π0π0η)=(3.8±1.1±0.7)×10−4 and B(D0→π0ηη)=(7.3±1.6±1.5)×10−4 with the statistical significances of 4.8σ, 3.8σ and 5.5σ, respectively, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second ones systematic. No significant signal of D0→ηηη is found, and the upper limit on its decay branching fraction is set to be B(D0→ηηη)<1.3×10−4 at the 90% confidence level.
20 references, page 1 of 2
[1] M. Gaspero, et al., Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 014015.
[2] LHCb Collaboration, Synergy of BESIII and LHCb physics programmes, LHCbPUB-2016-025.
[3] P. Rubin, et al., CLEO Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 081802.
[4] M. Ablikim, et al., BESIII Collaboration, Chin. Phys. C 37 (2013) 123001; M. Ablikim, et al., BESIII Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016) 629.
[5] M. Ablikim, et al., BESIII Collaboration, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 614 (2010) 345.
[6] S. Agostinelli, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506 (2003) 250.
[7] S. Jadach, B.F.L. Ward, Z. Was, Comput. Phys. Commun. 130 (2000) 260.
[8] S. Jadach, B.F.L. Ward, Z. Was, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 113009.
[9] K.A. Olive, et al., Particle Data Group, Chin. Phys. C 38 (2014) 090001.
[10] R.G. Ping, Chin. Phys. C 32 (2008) 599.
3 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2022IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2022IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!

Using a data sample of e+e− collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.93 fb−1 collected with the BESIII detector at a center-of-mass energy of s=3.773GeV, we search for the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays D0→π0π0π0, π0π0η, π0ηη and ηηη using the double tag method. The absolute branching fractions are measured to be B(D0→π0π0π0)=(2.0±0.4±0.3)×10−4, B(D0→π0π0η)=(3.8±1.1±0.7)×10−4 and B(D0→π0ηη)=(7.3±1.6±1.5)×10−4 with the statistical significances of 4.8σ, 3.8σ and 5.5σ, respectively, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second ones systematic. No significant signal of D0→ηηη is found, and the upper limit on its decay branching fraction is set to be B(D0→ηηη)<1.3×10−4 at the 90% confidence level.