Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Управленческое консу...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Управленческое консультирование
Article . 2012
Data sources: CyberLeninka - Russian open access scientific library
Claim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Пределы усмотрения как общетеоретическая проблема в контексте практики Конституционного Суда Российской Федерации

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jan 2012 Russian Publisher:Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации»Journal:Управленческое консультирование (issn: 1726-1139, eissn: 1816-8590, Copyright policy )

Пределы усмотрения как общетеоретическая проблема в контексте практики Конституционного Суда Российской Федерации

Abstract

The article analyzes the positions of national legal experts on topics concerning limits of discretion (judicial, administrative, law enforcement), and some general conclusions are provided. An attempt is made to correlate the prevailing provisions of legal science to the sphere of the constitutional court proceedings.

В статье дается анализ позиций отечественных правоведов, касающихся темы пределов усмотрения (судебного, административного, правоприменительного), и делаются некоторые обобщающие выводы. Предпринимается попытка соотнесения господствующих положений правовой науки со сферой конституционного судопроизводства.

Keywords

УСМОТРЕНИЕ,СУДЕБНОЕ УСМОТРЕНИЕ,АДМИНИСТРАТИВНОЕ УСМОТРЕНИЕ,ПРАВОПРИМЕНИТЕЛЬНОЕ УСМОТРЕНИЕ,ПРЕДЕЛЫ УСМОТРЕНИЯ,КОНСТИТУЦИОННОЕ СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВО,КОНСТИТУЦИОННЫЙ СУД РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities
Knowmad Institut