
В статье рассматриваются современные направления исследования различных жанров судебного дискурса, определяются теоретические основания и описывается методика лингвокогнитивного анализа аргументации в текстах судебных решений. В процессе анализа осуществляется типология аргументативных фреймов с учетом диктумных и модусных функций высказываний, определяется лингвистический инструментарий их языковой репрезентации.The article analyses the current trends of linguistic research as far as various genres of legal discourse are concerned. The article specifies the research theoretical background and introduces the methodology to analyse linguistic and cognitive aspects of argumentation in court decision texts. The analysis results in argumentative frames typology that takes into account dictum and modus functions in the utterances. Further on linguistic means to represent these functions in court decision texts are described.
ЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКАЯ АРГУМЕНТАЦИЯ, ФРЕЙМОВОЕ МОДЕЛИРОВАНИЕ, ЖАНР СУДЕБНОГО РЕШЕНИЯ, ФУНКЦИИ ДИКТУМА И МОДУСА
ЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКАЯ АРГУМЕНТАЦИЯ, ФРЕЙМОВОЕ МОДЕЛИРОВАНИЕ, ЖАНР СУДЕБНОГО РЕШЕНИЯ, ФУНКЦИИ ДИКТУМА И МОДУСА
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
