Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ CyberLeninka - Russi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Драматургический дискурс как статусно новое дискурсивное образование

Драматургический дискурс как статусно новое дискурсивное образование

Abstract

The interdisciplinary research, in particular in the study of the typology of discursive formations is very important in modern linguistic science. The paper summarizes the main points that characterize the basically new type of discursive formation dramatic discourse (DD) as an object of linguistic analysis. The methodological basis of the study includes the principal propositions on the language as a system of interrelated elements, on the dichotomy of language and speech, on the inextricable link of language and thinking, on language and reality, on the form and content unity and on the relationship of theoretical and empirical knowledge in philosophy and language. Peculiarities of dramatic discourse and the dramatic discourse model with its discoursive characteristics are presented here. The dramatic discourse is described as a phenomenon with a rich explanatory potential of theoretical and applied nature. A holistic model of dramatic discourse is built upon from the specific components of discourse which reflect cognitive-discursive characteristics of the dramatic discourse. The meaning-generating ability of the dramatic discourse is caused by its ‘dipping into life’, which is implemented mainly in the process of the linguocreative understanding of eventful content. One and the same type of the discourse is able to produce different language signs as a result of reflection and rethinking of the eventful content of discourse and modeling of the virtual world.

В современной лингвистической науке особое значение приобретают междисциплинарные исследования, особенно в области изучения типологии дискурсивных образований. Обобщаются основные положения, характеризующие статусно новый тип дискурсной формации - драматургический дискурс (ДД) как объект лингвистического анализа. Методологической основой исследования стали фундаментальные положения о языке как системе взаимосвязных элементов, о дихотомии языка и речи, о неразрывной связи языка и мышления, языка и действительности, о единстве формы и содержания, о связи теоретического и эмпирического знаний в философии и языке. Представлены его квалификационные характеристики и предложена модель ДД в ее дискурсообразующих признаках. ДД позиционируется как феномен с богатым объяснительным потенциалом теоретического и прикладного характера. Целостная модель драматургического дискурса выстраивается из специфических составляющих дискурса, отражающих когнитивно-дискурсивные характеристики собственно ДД. Отмечается, что смыслогенерирующая способность ДД обусловливается тем, что его «погружение в жизнь» осуществляется главным образом в процессе лингвокреативного осмысления событийного содержания. В результате осмыслений и переосмыслений событийного содержания дискурса и моделирования виртуального мира один и тот же дискурс способен порождать разные языковые знаки.

Keywords

ТИПОЛОГИЯ ДИСКУРСА, ДРАМАТУРГИЧЕСКИЙ ТЕКСТ, ДРАМАТУРГИЧЕСКИЙ ДИСКУРС, МОДЕЛЬ ДД, АМБИВАЛЕНТНОСТЬ ДД, ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЯ ДИСКУРСА, КОГНИТИВНО-СЕМИОТИЧЕСКИЙ ПОДХОД, ТYPOLOGY OF DISCOURSE

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green