Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Voprosy Kognitivnoy ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Оценочный профиль области «Человек» как реализация интерпретирующего потенциала лексических категорий (на материале английского языка)

Оценочный профиль области «Человек» как реализация интерпретирующего потенциала лексических категорий (на материале английского языка)

Abstract

The article considers the cognitive grounds of formation of evaluative meanings for the field “human being” on the basis of knowledge structures verbalized in lexical categories that represent world’s ontology. The conceptual content and structure of the lexical categories make up their interpretative potential. It means that differential properties of the categorial elements are viewed as basic concepts for evaluative conceptualization. The realization of interpretative potential of such categories as “birds”, “animals”, “artifacts”, “objects of inanimate nature”, “nature phenomena” is conditioned by their ability to deliver evaluative conceptualization of domains of the field “human being”: “physical parameters”, “psyche”, “socialization”. It becomes possible in the course of setting corresponding inter-conceptual connections in the process of conceptual derivation. Thus, the domain “physical parameters”, as differentiated in the sub-domain “human appearance”, acquires evaluative conceptualization through such lexical categories as “birds”, “animals”, “plants”, “substances”. The domain “psyche” is realized in the sub-domains “intellectual abilities”, “behavior”, “disposition”. The evaluative profile of this domain is represented by the categories “animals”, “birds”, “fruits”, “artifacts”, “nature phenomena”. The domain “socialization”, as differentiated in the subdomain “social status”, is conceptualized in terms of the categories “birds”, “fruits”, “artifacts”, “nature phenomena”. The analysis of evaluative conceptualization of the field “human being” reveals that lexical units of different “ontological” categories form a group on the basis of their ability to effect characterizing interpretation of the field in question. It entails their entering evaluative categories as their non-prototypical members.

В статье рассматриваются когнитивные основы формирования оценочных смыслов для области «человек» на основе знания, вербализованного в лексических категориях, отображающих онтологию мира, на материале английского языка. Реализация интерпретирующего потенциала таких категорий, как: птицы, животные, артефакты, объекты неживой природы, явления природы, определяется их способностью транслировать оценочное осмысление доменов области «человек»: «физические параметры», «психика», «социализация» на основе установления соответствующих межконцептуальных связей в процессе концептуальной деривации.

Keywords

ЯЗЫКОВАЯ ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЯ,LINGUISTIC INTERPRETATION,ЛЕКСИЧЕСКИЕ КАТЕГОРИИ,LEXICAL CATEGORIES,ИНТЕРПРЕТИРУЮЩИЙ ПОТЕНЦИАЛ,INTERPRETATIVE POTENTIAL,ОЦЕНОЧНЫЕ КАТЕГОРИИ,EVALUATIVE CATEGORIES,УРОВНИ ОЦЕНОЧНОЙ КАТЕГОРИЗАЦИИ,LEVELS OF EVALUATIVE CATEGORIZATION,КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНАЯ ДЕРИВАЦИЯ,CONCEPTUAL DERIVATION,ДОМЕНЫ,DOMAINS,МЕЖКОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫЕ СВЯЗИ,INTER-CONCEPTUAL CONNECTIONS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze