
Hygienic assessment of working conditions of employees of the Omsk Regional Broadcasting Centre was performed on data of the analysis of materials of certification of workplaces. There were examined materials concerning 65 core profile workplaces, where 130 persons, including 35 women work. There was determined health risk for personnel in dependence on working conditions. The staff was noted to be exposed to the adverse impact of the following factors: chemical, physical (noise, general and local vibration, non-ionizing radiation, microclimate, lighting), severity and intensity of work. Class working conditions for 13,5% of workplaces on noise, 35,4% on non-ionizing radiation was assessed as a harmful of the first degree. Lightness indices at 78,5% of the workplaces did not meet the requirements of sanitary norms. At 7,7% of the workplaces levels of hardness of labor were assessed as harmful. The impact of such factors as biological, infrasound, ultrasound, ionizing radiation, aerosols with mainly fibrogenic action, was absent, their assessment was not carried out. Working conditions at 83,1% of workplaces were characterized as hazardous, including at 52,3% of the workplaces where there was established hazard class 3.1, at 30,7% of workplaces Class 3.2. Among all the factors of occupational environment the largest contribution into the overall assessment of working conditions was made by the lightness factor (50,9%) and non-ionizing radiation (20,6%). The most harmful working conditions have been identified for workplaces of the operator of masthead antenna, engineer of radiocommunications, broadcasting and television, electromechanician of television (radiocommunication), (broadcasting), car driver.
Гигиеническая оценка условий труда работников Омского областного радиотелевизионного передающего центра проведена по данным анализа материалов аттестации рабочих мест. Изучены материалы 65 основных профильных рабочих мест, на которых работают 130 человек, в том числе 35 женщин, определен риск здоровью персонала в зависимости от условий труда. Отмечено негативное воздействие на персонал тяжести и напряженности труда, химических и физических (шум, общая и локальная вибрация, неионизирующие излучения, микроклимат, освещенность) факторов. Класс условий труда на 13,5% рабочих мест по шуму и на 35,4% по неионизирующему излучению оценивали как вредный I степени. Показатели освещенности на 78,5% рабочих мест не соответствовали требованиям санитарных норм. На 7,7% рабочих мест уровни напряженности труда оценивались как вредные. Воздействие таких факторов, как биологические, инфразвук, ультразвук, ионизирующее излучение, аэрозоли преимущественно фиброгенного действия, не проводили. Условия труда на 83,1% рабочих мест характеризовались как вредные, в том числе на 52,3% рабочих мест был установлен класс вредности 31, на 30,7% рабочих мест класс 3.2. Среди всех факторов производственной среды наибольший вклад в суммарную оценку условий труда оказывали фактор освещенности (50,9%) и неионизирующее излучение (20,6%). Наиболее вредные условия труда были определены на рабочих местах антенщика-мачтовика, инженера средств радио и телевидения, электромеханика телевидения (радиовещания), водителя автомобиля.
РАДИОТЕЛЕВИЗИОННЫЙ ПЕРЕДАЮЩИЙ ЦЕНТР,ГИГИЕНИЧЕСКАЯ ОЦЕНКА,УСЛОВИЯ ТРУДА,ОЦЕНКА РИСКА,ЗДОРОВЬЕ РАБОТАЮЩИХ,BROADCASTING CENTER,HYGIENIC ASSESSMENT,WORKING CONDITIONS,RISK ASSESSMENT,WORKERS' HEALTH
РАДИОТЕЛЕВИЗИОННЫЙ ПЕРЕДАЮЩИЙ ЦЕНТР,ГИГИЕНИЧЕСКАЯ ОЦЕНКА,УСЛОВИЯ ТРУДА,ОЦЕНКА РИСКА,ЗДОРОВЬЕ РАБОТАЮЩИХ,BROADCASTING CENTER,HYGIENIC ASSESSMENT,WORKING CONDITIONS,RISK ASSESSMENT,WORKERS' HEALTH
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
