
Leading countries consider regional clusters an efficient tool of interaction between actors of a regional innovation system, which enables new poles of economic growth to be formed. There is a large literature describing the positive experience of public support for clusters. In Russia, this process is still at an early stage. Russia’s strategy of innovative development up to 2020 includes a programme for supporting pilot innovative regional clusters. The aim is to make these clusters self-sustainable. The emergence and outlook of a cluster largely depend on a range of basic conditions such as: the urban environment; an available critical mass of specialized companies; internal competition; and openness to the outside world. There is always a risk that without government support, the cluster will not be able to shift to the desired trajectory. The paper reviews existing studies on the best practices of implementing state cluster policy in different parts of the world. It provides a detailed analysis of the characteristic features of successful clusters, and evaluates the extent to which Russia’s pilot innovative regional clusters match these criteria of success. It also quantitatively compares domestic and foreign clusters, and suggests a model for sustainable cluster development. The study is based on an empirical analysis of the development programmes of pilot innovative regional clusters that were submitted to the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia in 2012 as part of a special competition. The paper also analyses the results of a survey commissioned by the joint stock company ‘Russian Venture Company’ at the end of 2013.
Территориальные кластеры являются локомотивами экономического роста и эффективным инструментом взаимодействия между участниками региональных инновационных систем во многих странах мира. Существуют различные финансовые и нематериальные механизмы их государственной поддержки, цель которых — перевести такие образования в фазу устойчивого развития. Однако становление кластера и его перспективы зависят от многих факторов, поэтому сохраняется риск, что без государственной поддержки кластер не сможет выйти на нужную траекторию. В статье анализируется российский опыт реализации программ развития пилотных инновационных территориальных кластеров и сформулированы признаки их устойчивости.
КЛАСТЕР,КЛАСТЕРНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА,ОТКРЫТЫЕ ИННОВАЦИИ,ПИЛОТНЫЕ ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНЫЕ КЛАСТЕРЫ, cluster; cluster policy; open innovation; pilot innovative territorial clusters
КЛАСТЕР,КЛАСТЕРНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА,ОТКРЫТЫЕ ИННОВАЦИИ,ПИЛОТНЫЕ ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНЫЕ КЛАСТЕРЫ, cluster; cluster policy; open innovation; pilot innovative territorial clusters
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
