
This article is devoted to the urgent problem of the training of experts candidates for members of the selection committee of inspection tasks with detailed answer in Maths. The paper describes the main stages of preparation of the candidate to the subject as an expert committee, the comparative analysis of the main requirements to the experts in Maths and other members of the subject committees. As a conclusion, we can add that can be traced more stringent coherence indicators for leading, senior and key experts in mathematics, and as a consequence, for the training of experts in mathematics should consider in more detail the methodology and consistency of the development of approaches to assessment tasks with detailed answer, and work with the criteria.
Настоящая статья посвящена актуальной проблеме подготовки экспертов кандидатов в члены предметной комиссии по проверке заданий с развернутым ответом по математике. Описаны основные этапы подготовки кандидата в предметную комиссию в роли эксперта, проведен сравнительный анализ основных требований к экспертам по математике и к членам других предметных комиссий. В качестве вывода следует, что прослеживаются более жесткие показатели согласованности для ведущих, старших и основных экспертов по математике, поэтому для обучения экспертов по математике необходимо продумать более детально методику и последовательность освоения подходов к оцениванию заданий с развернутым ответом и работы с критериями.
ЕДИНЫЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ ЭКЗАМЕН,ОБУЧЕНИЕ ЭКСПЕРТОВ,КРИТЕРИИ ОЦЕНИВАНИЯ ЗАДАНИЙ С РАЗВЕРНУТЫМ ОТВЕТОМ ПО МАТЕМАТИКЕ,UNIFIED STATE EXAM IN RUSSIA,EXPERT TRAINING,JOB EVALUATION CRITERIA WITH DETAILED RESPONSE IN MATHS
ЕДИНЫЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ ЭКЗАМЕН,ОБУЧЕНИЕ ЭКСПЕРТОВ,КРИТЕРИИ ОЦЕНИВАНИЯ ЗАДАНИЙ С РАЗВЕРНУТЫМ ОТВЕТОМ ПО МАТЕМАТИКЕ,UNIFIED STATE EXAM IN RUSSIA,EXPERT TRAINING,JOB EVALUATION CRITERIA WITH DETAILED RESPONSE IN MATHS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
