Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Vestnik Tomskogo gos...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Повествование о читателе: литература в полемике с теорией

Повествование о читателе: литература в полемике с теорией

Abstract

The article is dedicated to phenomenon of literatures dispute with idea about itself, insisted upon by modern theory of aesthetics and ideology of reading. The subject under review is a specific form of such dispute: the one that has been expressed in the form of narration about the reading individual. The hero of such narration is often described as a carrier of mind which reproduces cultural mythology of reading and literature, contemporary to him. He is also a bearer of the event which shapes the main plot of a writing. Address to such kind of heroes creates an autoreflective directionality for literature: building a plot around readers figure, literature exposes situation of reading (and, wider, the problem of functioning of literature-artistic and literature-critical product in the history of the reader) to metaliterature examination. Such kind of autoreflective tendencycan be found in a row of literature implementation. The earliest example of this is obviously M. Servantes novel, whose heros story lines up polemic with traditionalist cult of sacral mimetic reading. In romantic prose of this kind autoreflective tendency discovers itself in narrative polemics with contemporary myth about literature as the highest dimension in a human life. In works of Stendhal, Merimee and Flaubert in dispute with cultural myth of literatures reference and cognitive virtue of reading, myth, created within aesthetics of realism. The subject of this article is specifics of artistic reflection in regard to contemporary philosophical and aesthetical concept of literature, formulated in narrations about readers of modernism and postmodernism. In literature of modernism in stories about readers we can find polemics with modernistic cult of literature as a form of magic (J.-P. Sartre) transformation of life. It is being examined on material of Canettis Blinding and G. Ayzenrayhs Dostoevsky-like adventure. In attempt to substitute reallife context with library cult (in the former) and with event, designed according to the literature pattern (in the latter), main characters of the writings fail. In postmodernism literature about the reader we can discover polemics with postmodernistic idea of literatures loss of its own functionality. Literatures reaction to such thesis is being investigated basing on A. Byatts novel Possession and the writing of Latin-American author C.-M. Dominguez The House of paper.

Рассматривается явление полемики литературы с тем представлением о ней, на котором настаивает современная ей эстетическая теория. Предметом рассмотрения является особая форма такой полемики: та, которая нашла свое выражение в форме повествования о читающем человеке. Дискурс о читателе при этом трактуется как форма авторефлексивной тенденции в литературе. Статья выполнена на материале литературы зарубежного модернизма и постмодернизма

Keywords

ГЕРОЙ-ЧИТАТЕЛЬ, ЛИТЕРАТУРНАЯ АВТОРЕФЛЕКСИЯ, МИФОЛОГИЯ ЧТЕНИЯ, МОДЕРНИЗМ, ПОСТМОДЕРНИЗМ

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold