1. Almonaitiene, J. (2000a). Šiuolaikinis požiūris į kūrybingumą ir jo įvertinimo problemos. Psichologija. Mokslo darbai, 21, 82-90.
2. Almonaitiene, J. (2000b). Kūrybingumo ir inovacijų psichologija. Kaunas: Technologija.
13. Kirton, M.J. (1984). Adaptors and Innovators - Why New Initiatives Get Blocked. Long range planning, 17(2), 137-143.
14. Kirton, M.J. (2000a). A Theory of Cognitive style. In M.J. Kirton (Ed.), Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem Solving (p. 1-33). London, N.Y.: Routledge.
15. Kirton, M.J. (2000b). Adaptors and Innovators at Work. In M.J. Kirton (Ed.), Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem Solving (p. 51-71). London, N. Y.: Routledge.
16. Plucker, J.A., & Renzulli, J.S. (1999). Psychometric Approaches to the Study of Human Creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook ofcreativity (p. 35-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Sternberg, R.J. (1988). A Three-facet Model of Creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (p. 148-176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Torrance, E.P. (1988). The Nature of Creativity as Manifested in it's Testing. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), TTie Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (p. 43-75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Amabile, T. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. N.Y.: Springer-Verlag. [OpenAIRE]
4. Gilhooly, K.J. (1996). Thinking: Directed, Undirected and Creative (3'J ed.). London: Academic Press.
5. Goldsmith, R E . (2000) Creative Style and Personality Theory. In The aim of the present study was to investigate the possibility to M.J. Kirton (Ed), Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity measure individual differences in creativity, problem solving and and Problem Solving (pp. 34-50). London, N. Y.: Routledge. decision-making using the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI). 193 Kaunas University of Technology students completed a preliminary
6. Haensly, P.A., & Torrance, E.P. (1990). Assessment of Creativity Lithuanian form of the test. Statistical analysis of the data has shown that in Children and Adolescents. In C R . Reynolds, & R.VV. Kampliaus the internal reliability of the preliminary Lithuanian form of the inventory (Eds.), Handbook ofPsychological and Educational Assessment of is sufficient (the Cronbach Alpha for the lesponscs was .85). Distribution Children. Intelligence and Achievement (p. C97-722). N.Y., of the scores is close to a normal curve. Distribution of the inventory London: The Guilford Press. items over the possible scoring range has shown that most of them
7. Hatcher, L. (1996). A Step-by-step Approach to Using the SAS discriminate according to their individual difference quite well. But the System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling. mean -core of the Lithuanian students' group (87,67) was significantly Cary: SAS institute (p<0,05) lower than the general population mean scores in UK (94,99), USA (94,98), Slovakia (95,06), etc. which shows that these students tend
8. Hocevar, D., & Dachclor, P. (1989). A Taxonomy and Critique of to be more adaptive than the population of the other countries. It was also Measurements Used in Study of Creativity. In J.A. Glover, significantly lower than theoretical mean of the scale, which equals 96. R.R. Ronning, & C R . Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity There is a possibility, thus, that the social cultural environment could (p. 53-75). N.Y.: Plenum. influence the students' scores. However, this doesn't correspond with the
9. Holland, P.A., Bowskill, I., & Bailey, A. (1991). Adaptors and statement of M.J. Kirton, the creator of the inventory, who claims that Innovators: Selection vs. Induction. Psychological reports, 68, adaption-innovation preferences remain stable over time and culture and 1283-1290. represent stable personality dimensions distributed normally over the