publication . Preprint . Article . Other literature type . 2019

Plant coexistence mediated by adaptive foraging preferences of exploiters or mutualists

Křivan, Vlastimil; Revilla, Tomás A.;
Open Access English
  • Published: 01 Nov 2019
Comment: 33 pages, 9 figures
Persistent Identifiers
Medical Subject Headings: food and beveragesfungi
free text keywords: Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution, behaviorally-mediated interactions, competition for preference, differential inclusion, generalized isocline, switching, sliding and repelling regimes, General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Modelling and Simulation, Statistics and Probability, General Immunology and Microbiology, Applied Mathematics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, General Medicine, Herbivore, Competition (biology), media_common.quotation_subject, media_common, Mutualism (biology), Alternative stable state, Biology, Isocline, Ecology, Pollinator, Mutualism (economic theory), Foraging
Funded by
EC| FourCmodelling
Conflict, Competition, Cooperation and Complexity: Using Evolutionary Game Theory to model realistic populations
  • Funder: European Commission (EC)
  • Project Code: 690817
  • Funding stream: H2020 | MSCA-RISE
Validated by funder
46 references, page 1 of 4

Abrams, P. A. and H. Matsuda (1996). Positive indirect effects between prey species that share predators. Ecology 77, 610-616.

Adler, P. B., D. Smull, K. H. Beard, R. T. Choi, T. Furniss, A. Kulmatiski, J. M. Meiners, A. T. Tredennick, and K. E. Veblen (2018). Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition. Ecology Letters 21, 1319-1329. [OpenAIRE]

Aubin, J. P. and A. Cellina (1984). Differential Inclusions: Set-valued Maps and Viability Theory. SpringerVerlag.

Bastolla, U., M. A. Fortuna, A. Pascual-García, A. Ferrera, B. Luque, and J. Bascompte (2009). The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Nature 458, 1018-1020. [OpenAIRE]

Berec, L., J. Eisner, and V. Krivan (2010). Adaptive foraging does not always lead to more complex food webs. Journal of Theoretical Biology 266, 211-218.

Bolker, B., M. Holyoak, V. Křivan, L. Rowe, and O. Schmitz (2003). Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology 84, 1101-1114.

Bronstein, J. L. (2015). Mutualism. Oxford University Press.

Colombo, R. and V. Křivan (1993). Selective strategies in food webs. IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Medicine and Biology 10, 281-291.

Egas, M., U. Dieckmann, and M. W. Sabelis (2004). Evolution restricts the coexistence of specialists and generalists: the role of trade-off structure. American Naturalist 163, 518-531. [OpenAIRE]

Feinsinger, P. (1987). Effects of plant species on each other's pollination: is community structure influenced? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2, 123-126. [OpenAIRE]

Filippov, A. F. (1988). Differential equations with discontinuous righthand sides. Academic Publishers.

Fontaine, C., I. Dajoz, J. Meriguet, and M. Loreau (2005). Functional diversity of plant-pollinator interaction webs enhances the persistence of plant communities. PLoS Biology 4 (1), e1.

Fontaine, C., E. Thébault, and I. Dajoz (2009). Are insect pollinators more generalist than insect herbivores? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276, 3027-3033. [OpenAIRE]

Georgelin, E. and N. Loeuille (2014). Dynamics of coupled mutualistic and antagonistic interactions, and their implications for ecosystem management. Journal of Theoretical Biology 346, 67-74. [OpenAIRE]

Geslin, B., B. Gauzens, M. Baude, I. Dajoz, C. Fontaine, M. Henry, L. Ropars, O. Rollin, E. Thébault, and N. Vereecken (2017). Massively Introduced Managed Species and Their Consequences for PlantPollinator Interactions. Advances in Ecological Research 57, 147-199.

46 references, page 1 of 4
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue