publication . Other literature type . Article . 2017

Explaining alienability contrasts in adpossessive constructions: Predictability vs. iconicity

Haspelmath, Martin;
Open Access
  • Published: 25 Oct 2017
  • Publisher: Zenodo
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This paper argues that alienability contrasts in adnominal possessive constructions should not be explained by iconicity of distance, but by predictability due to the higher relative frequency of possessed occurrences of inalienable nouns. While it is true that when there is an alienability split, the alienable construction typically has an additional marker which often separates the possessor from the possessed noun, the broader generalization is that additional marking is found when the possessive relationship is less predictable. This generalization also extends to cases of antipossessive marking and impossessibility. ...
Subjects
free text keywords: possessive construction, inalienable possession, iconicity, Sociology, Predictability, Linguistics, Iconicity, Contrast (statistics)
Related Organizations
Funded by
EC| FormGram
Project
FormGram
Form-frequency correspondences in grammar
  • Funder: European Commission (EC)
  • Project Code: 670985
  • Funding stream: H2020 | ERC | ERC-ADG
Download fromView all 9 versions
Zenodo
Other literature type . 2017
Provider: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2017
Provider: ZENODO
Zenodo
Other literature type . 2017
Provider: Datacite
Powered by OpenAIRE Open Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue
publication . Other literature type . Article . 2017

Explaining alienability contrasts in adpossessive constructions: Predictability vs. iconicity

Haspelmath, Martin;