publication . Other literature type . Article . 2009

Diversity In The Socio-Economic Role Of The Main Non-Wood Forest Products For The Inhabitants Of Small Villages And Large Towns In Poland

Barszcz, Anna; Suder, Alicja;
Open Access
  • Published: 01 Feb 2009
  • Publisher: Zenodo
Abstract
The NWFPs (non-wood forest products) sector is of the crucial importance to the Polish households but its social and economic role is varied and depends on place of residence. For the inhabitants of villages and small towns forests are<br> the place of working and NWFPs sale provides an additional fnancial resource. City-dwellers do not treat NWFPs<br> as a source of income but rather as an element of recreation and they use these products mainly for their own needs.<br> Some remarks for the developing of this sector in Poland were given in this paper.<br>
Subjects
free text keywords: non-wood forest product, household income, living standard, villages, towns, non-wood forest product, household income, living standard, villages, towns
Download fromView all 5 versions
Zenodo
Other literature type . 2009
Provider: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2009
Provider: ZENODO
Zenodo
Other literature type . 2009
Provider: Datacite
Zenodo
Other literature type . 2009
Provider: Datacite

Barszcz A. 2005. An overview of non-wood forest products in Poland. Proceed. “Non - wood forest products and poverty mitigation: concepts, overviews and cases”. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, Res. Notes, 166, 1-20.

Barszcz A. 2006. The inuflence of harvesting of nonwood forest products on the economic situation of households in Poland. EJPAU, Forestry, 9, 2.

Delang C. O. 2006. Not just minor forest products: The economic rationale for the consumption of wild food plants by subsistence farmers. Ecol. Econ., 59, 64-73.

Jansea G., Ottitschb A. 2005. Factors inuflencing the role of Non-Wood Forest Products and Services. Forest Pol. Econ., 7, 309-319.

FAO 2002. Non-Wood Forest Products. Source: http:// www.fao.org.

FAO 2005. Global Forest Resources Assessment. Progress towards sustainable forest management. Source: http://www.fao.org.

Głowacki S. 1995. Wybrane materiały do ćwiczeń z ubocznego użytkowania lasu. Wydawnictwo SGGW, Warszawa.

Głowacki S. 2000. Aktualne problemy ubocznego użytkowania lasu w Polsce. Proceed. „Stan i perspektywy badań w zakresie użytkowania lasu”. 30-31 March 2000, Forest Research Institute, Sękocin, Poland.

Leśnictwo 2005. Wydawnictwo GUS, Warszawa.

Muszyński Z., Muszyński J. 2000. Problem zrównoważonego i trwałego użytkowania runa leśnego. Proceed. „Stan i perspektywy badań w zakresie użytkowania lasu”. 30-31 March 2000, Forest Research Institute, Sękocin, Poland.

Rutkauskas A. 1998. Non-wood recources and their utilization in Lithuania. [In:] Sustainable developement of non wood goods and benetfis from boreal and cold temperate forests (eds.: G. Lund, B. Pajari, M. Korhonen). EFI Proceedings, 18-22 January 1998, Joensuu, Finland, 23, 93-101.

Saastamoinen O., Kangas K., Aho H. 2000. The picking of wild berries in Finland in 1997 and 1998. Scand. J. For. Res., 15, 645-650.

Šišak L. 2000. Importance of the main non-timber forest products in the Czech Republic in 1998. J. For. Sc., 46 (7), 331-339.

Šišak L. 1998. Socio-economic importance of main non-wood forest products in the Czech Republik. Lesnictvi-Forestry, 44 (12), 542-548.

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe/ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. 2005. European forest sector outlook study. Main Report. Geneva.

Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue