publication . Other literature type . 2020

#bropenscience is broken science

Whitaker, Kirstie J.; Guest, Olivia;
Open Access English
  • Published: 13 Oct 2020
Over the last decade, a vocal and hardworking group of psychological scientists have set about reforming the ways we carry out analyses, share data and code, pass around manuscripts, and select which findings to report (e.g. Altmejd et al., 2019; Frank et al., 2017; Shanks et al., 2013). This group has been spurred into action by a variety of disappointing stories about irreplicable research (Open Science Collaboration, 2015) – due to both purposeful misconduct and variable guidance for transparent reporting standards – as well as inspired by the pre-existing ideals of ‘open science’. It might not come as a surprise to psychologists, however, that it is a very n...
Download from
Other literature type . 2020
Provider: ZENODO
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue