Improving Student Engagement in the Study of Professional Ethics: Concepts and an Example in Cyber Security

Article English OPEN
Bustard, John D. (2017)
  • Publisher: Springer Netherlands
  • Journal: volume 24, issue 2, pages 683-698 (issn: 1353-3452, eissn: 1471-5546)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9904-4, pmc: PMC5876413
  • Subject: Curriculum development | Cyber security | Psychology | Ethics, Professional | Case studies | Original Paper | Ethics | Curriculum design | Cybersecurity, research,inovation, trust, resilience, translation

In spite of the acknowledged importance of professional ethics, technical students often show little enthusiasm for studying the subject. This paper considers how such engagement might be improved. Four guiding principles for promoting engagement are identified: (1) aligning teaching content with student interests; (2) taking a pragmatic rather than a philosophical approach to issue resolution; (3) addressing the full complexity of real-world case studies; and (4) covering content in a way that students find entertaining. The use of these principles is then discussed with respect to the specific experience of developing and presenting a master’s module in Ethical and Legal Issues in Cyber Security at Queens University Belfast. One significant aspect of the resulting design is that it encourages students to see ethical issues in systemic terms rather than from an individual perspective, with issues emerging from a conflict between different groups with different vested interests. Case studies are used to examine how personal and business priorities create conflicts that can lead to negative press, fines and punitive legal action. The module explores the reasons why organisations may be unaware of the risks associated with their actions and how an inappropriate response to an ethical issue can significantly aggravate a situation. The module has been delivered in three successive years since 2014 and been well received on each occasion. The paper describes the design of the module and the experience of delivering it, concluding with a discussion of the effectiveness of the approach.
  • References (45)
    45 references, page 1 of 5

    Alinsky, S. (2010). Rules for radicals: A pragmatic primer for realistic radicals. Vintage.

    Alterio, M, McDrury, J. Learning through storytelling in higher education: Using reflection and experience to improve learning. 2003

    Bairaktarova, D., & Woodcock, A. (2016). Engineering student’s ethical awareness and behavior: A new motivational model. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9814-x.

    Baldini, G., Botterman, M., Neisse, R., & Tallacchini, M. (2016). Ethical design in the internet of things. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9754-5.

    BBC News (2016). UK must retaliate against cyber-attacks says chancellor. Article. BBC News. Accessed February 22, 2017, www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-37821867.

    Bucciarelli, LL. Ethics and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2008; 33 (2): 141-149

    Bustard, J. D. (2013). Ethical issues surrounding the asymmetric nature of workplace monitoring. In L. Marinos & I. Askoxylakis (Eds.), International conference on human aspects of information security, privacy, and trust (pp. 226–235). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Bustard, JD. The Impact of EU privacy legislation on biometric system deployment: protecting citizens but constraining applications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 2015; 32 (5): 101-108

    Coldwell, J. (2000). It is possible to teach computer ethics via distance education!. In J. Weckert (Ed.), Selected papers from the second Australian institute conference on computer ethics (pp. 73–80). Canberra: Australian Computer Society, Inc.

    DC-IoT (2016). Dynamic coalition on the internet of things. Accessed February 22, 2017, http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/documents/igf-meeting/igf-2016/827-dciot-2015-output-document-1/file.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark