Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Manchester eScholar ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Digital Mammography

Authors: Martí, J.; Oliver, A.; Freixenet, J.; Martí, R.;

Digital Mammography

Abstract

Breast density is positively linked to the risk of developing breast cancer. Furthermore, the addition of breast density as an input to breast cancer risk prediction models has been shown to improve their predictive power. Such models are used in the management of women at high risk but could potentially be used to determine screening strategy. A stepwedge-based technique has been used to measure volumetric density from the mammograms of 1,289 women in the UK screening programme who additionally completed a questionnaire on risk-related factors. The sample had a mean age of 60.1 (range 48.0 – 78.0), a mean breast thickness of 59mm (range 21 – 102mm) and a mean volumetric breast density of 11% (range 0.5 – 58%). Using Pearson’s correlation coefficient, breast density was found to be significantly correlated with weight (r = -0.45), body mass index (r = -0.48), age (r = -0.13) and breast thickness (r =-0.65) at the p = 0.01 level. Absolute glandular volume was also found to be significantly correlated with these parameters although the extent of correlation was weaker.

Keywords

breast density, volumetric technique, risk factors

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research