Aboulafia, M. (1995). Habermas and Mead: On universality and individuality. Constellations, 2, 94-113.
Adorno, T. (1966). Negative dialektik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Alexander, J. (1982). Theoretical logic in sociology. Vol. 1: Positivism, presuppositions, and current controversies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Alexander, J. (1993). The centrality of the classics. In A. Giddens & J. Turner (Eds.), Social theory today (pp. 11-57). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. (Original work published 1987)
Alexander, J., & Sciortino, G. (1996). On choosing one's intellectual predecessors: The reductionism of Camic's treatment of Parsons and the institutionalists. Sociological Theory, 14, 154-171.
Antonio, R. (1990). The decline of the grand narrative of emancipatory modernity: Crisis or renewal in neo-Marxian theory? In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Frontiers of social theory: The new syntheses (pp. 88-116). New York: Columbia University Press.
Baehr, P., & O'Brien, M. (1994). Founders, classics and the concept of a canon. Current Sociology, 42, 1-148.
Baynes, K. (1991). Rational reconstruction and social criticism: Habermas's model of interpretive social science. In M. Kelly (Ed.), Hermeneutics and critical theory in ethics and politics (pp. 122-145). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1990)
Blumer, H. (1937). Social psychology. In E. Schmidt (Ed.), Man and society (pp. 144-198). New York: Prentice-Hall.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Blumer, H. (1981). George Herbert Mead. In B. Rhea (Ed.), The future of the sociological classics (pp. 136-169). London: George Allen and Unwin.
Blumer, H. (1992a). Sociological implications of the thought of G. H. Mead. In P. Hamilton (Ed.), George Herbert Mead: Critical assessments (Vol. 2; pp. 30-46). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1966)
Blumer, H. (1992b). Reply to Woelfel, Stone and Farberman. In P. Hamilton (Ed.), George Herbert Mead: Critical assessments (Vol. 2; pp. 51-52). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1967)
Boucher, D. (1985). Texts in context. Revisionist methods for studying the history of ideas. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. [OpenAIRE]
Calhoun, C. (1996). Whose classics? Which readings? Interpretation and cultural difference in the canonization in sociological theory. In S. Turner (Ed.), Social theory and sociology. The classics and beyond (pp. 70-96). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.