publication . Article . 2014

Surrogacy commissioning fathers and HIV

Jordaan, D W;
Open Access English
  • Published: 01 Jan 2014
  • Publisher: Health and Medical Publishing Group
Abstract
Surrogacy is not regulated by a single legal instrument only, nor is confirmation of a surrogacy agreement by the High Court an unqualified green light for the surrogacy process to proceed. In the context of the HIV status of the commissioning father, whose gametes are to be used for the conception of the child in pursuance of a surrogacy agreement, the intended in vitro fertilisation of the surrogate mother may only take place on condition that the commissioning father, and his semen, have been tested for HIV; that he has consented to his HIV status being made available to the surrogate mother, and if he is HIV-positive, that sperm washing will be used to minim...
Subjects
mesheuropmc: virus diseases

1. Le Roux-Kemp A. HIV/AIDS, To Disclose or not to Disclose: aTht is the Question. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 2013;16(1):200-239. [http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v16i1.7]

2. NM and Others v. Smith and Others [2007] (5) SA 250 (CC).

3. Jansen van Vuuren and Another NNO v. Kruger [1993] (4) SA 842 (AD).

4. Health Professions Council of South Africa. Guidelines for Good Practice in the Health Care Professions: Ethical Guidelines for Good Practice With Regard to HIV. Booklet 11. Pretoria: HPCSA, 2008. http://www.hpcsa.co.za/downloads/conduct_ethics/rules/generic_ethical_rules/booklet_11_ hiv.pdf (accessed 22 November 2013).

5. South African Medical Association. Ethical and Human Rights Guidelines on HIV: A Manual for Medical Practitioners of South Africa (2001). http://www1.chr.up.ac.za/undp/domestic/docs/ policies_03.pdf (accessed 22 November 2013).

6. South African Government. Children's Act No. 35 of 2008. Pretoria: Government Printer, 2008.

7. South African Government. National Health Act No. 61 of 2003. Pretoria: Government Printer, 2003.

8. National Department of Health. Regulations Relating to Artificial Fertilisation of Persons. Government Notice R175/2012. http://www.doh.gov.za/docs/regulations/2012/regr175.pdf (accessed 22 November 2013).

9. Bujan L, Hollander L, Coudert M, et al. Safety and eficacy of sperm washing in HIV-1-serodiscordant couples where the male is infected: Results from the European CREAThE network. AIDS 2007;21(14):1909-1914. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282703879]

10. Hanabusa H, Kuji N, Kato S, et al. An evaluation of semen processing methods for eliminating HIV-1. AIDS 2000;14(11):1611-1616.

11. Nicopoullos JD, Almeida P, Vourliotis M, Gilling-Smith C. A decade of the United Kingdom spermwashing program: Untangling the transatlantic divide. Fertil Steril 2010;94(6):2458-2461. [http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.074]

12. Savasi V, Ferrazzi E, Lanzani C, et al. Safety of sperm washing and ART outcome in 741 HIV-1- serodiscordant couples. Hum Reprod 2006;22(3):772-777. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del422]

13. Semprini AE, Macaluso M, Hollander L, et al. safe conception for HIV-discordant couples: Insemination with processed semen from the HIV-infected partner. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208(5):402.e1-402. e9. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.009]

14. Castell v. De Greef [1994] (4) SA 408 (C).

15. Barkhuizen v. Napier [2007] (5) SA 323 (CC).

Powered by OpenAIRE Open Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue