publication . Article . 2017

Liquefied Natural Gas as an Alternative Fuel: a Regional-Level Social Cost-Benefit Appraisal

Fernando Caetano;
  • Published: 01 Nov 2017
  • Country: Portugal
The impact from traditional marine fuels has the potential of causing health and non-health damages and contributes to climate change. Here, the introduction of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) as an energy end-use fuel for marine purposes is analysed. The aim of this study is to verify LNG’s policy implementation feasibility as a step-change for a low carbon perspective for shipping by means of developing a social cost-benefit analysis on a regional basis. Emissions from the Portuguese merchant fleet, weighted by their contribution to the National Inventory, were used to quantify and monetise climate, health and non-health externalities compared with benefits from L...
free text keywords: Environmental, health and non-health impacts, Liquefied Natural Gas, Contingent valuation, Social cost-benefit analysis, Portuguese merchant fleet
Related Organizations
44 references, page 1 of 3

Amman, M., Derwent, D., Forsberg, B., Hänninen, O., Hurley, F., Krzyzanowski, M., de Leeuw, F., Liu, S., Mandin, C., Schneider, S., Schwarze, P., Simpson, D. (2008). Health risks of ozone from longrange transboundary air pollution. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe [OpenAIRE]

Barbier, E., Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N. (2015). Is the income elasticity of the willingness to pay for pollution control constant? University of Warsaw, faculty of Economic Sciences. Working Papers No. 7/2015 (155) [OpenAIRE]

Bateman, I. Langford, I., Jones, A., Kerr, G. (2001). Bound and Path Effects in Double and Triple Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. Resource and Energy Economics 23, 191-213

Baumgärtner, S., Drupp, M., Munz, J., Meya, J., Quaas, M. 2011 (2011). Income Distribution and Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services. Retrieved January 29, 2016 from [OpenAIRE]

Belhaj, M. (2003). Estimating the Benefits of Clean Air. Contingent Valuation and Hedonic Price Methods. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 3(1), 30-46

Bickel, P., Friedrich, R. (2001). Estimating Environmental Costs using the Impact Pathway Approach. Unification of accounts and marginal costs for Transport Efficiency. Retrieved October, 10, 2016 from

Bleichrodt, H., Crainich, D., Eeckhoudt, L. (2002). Comorbidities and the willingness to pay for health improvements. Journal of Public Economics, 87 2399-2406.

Cameron, J., Hunter, P., Jagals, P., Pond, K. (ed.), (2011). World Health Organization (WHO). Valuing Water, Valuing Livelihoods. London: London: IWA Publishing on behalf of the World Health Organization

Carson, R. Flores, N., Meade, N. (2000). Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19: 173-210

Carson, R. (2012). Contingent Valuation: A Practical Alternative when Prices Aren't Available. Prices Aren't Available. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(4), 27-42

Carson, R., Czajkowski, M. (2012). The Discrete Choice Experiment Approach to Environmental Contingent Valuation. Retrieved November, 21, 2017 from

Carson, R., Groves, T. (2011). Incentive and information properties of preference questions: commentary and extensions. In Bennet, J. (ed.) The international handbook on non- market environmental valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing

Carson, R,, Louviere, J. (2010). A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches. Environmental and Resource Economics, 49(4), 539-559

Chryssakis, C., Balland, O., Tvete, H., Brandsaeter, A. (2014). Alternative Fuels for Shipping. Dnv Gl Strategic Research, Innovation Position Paper 1-2014. DNV GL

Corbett, J., Fischbeck, P., Pandis, S. (1999). Global nitrogen and sulfur inventories for oceangoing ships. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104(3), 3457-3470 [OpenAIRE]

44 references, page 1 of 3
Powered by OpenAIRE Open Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue
publication . Article . 2017

Liquefied Natural Gas as an Alternative Fuel: a Regional-Level Social Cost-Benefit Appraisal

Fernando Caetano;