
?? ?????? ???????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????? 6G ?? ?????????????????????????? 101 ?????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ~ (32 ?? 5) ???? ?????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????. ??????????????????????, ???? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????? ?????????????????????? ???????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ???????? ??????????????????. ????????????????, ???? ?????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????? ????????????, ?????? ???????????? ?????????????? ?????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????? ????????????????????????. ???? ???????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ?????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ??????????????????????, ?????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ???? ?????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ??????????????.
?? ???????????? ???????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ???????????? ?????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????? ?????????????? 6G ?? ?????????????????????????? 101 ???? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????? ?????????????? ???????????????? ~ (32 ?? 5) ???? ?????? ???????????? ???????????????? ?????????????????????????? ??????????????????. ??????????????????????, ?????? ?????????????????? ???????????????????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????? ????????????????????. ????????????????, ?????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????? ????????????, ?????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????????????? ?? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????? ????????????????????. ???? ?????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ?????????? ?? ?????????????? ?????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ??????????????????????, ???????????????????? ?????????????? ???????????????? ?? ?????????????? ?????????????????????????? ???? ???????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ?????????????????? ??????????????.
In this work, the dependence of fluorescence intensity of Rhodamine 6G and Sulforhodamine 101 liquid solutions on concentration of silver nanoparticles with a radius ~ (32 ?? 5) nm is investigated with a different frequency of exciting radiation. It was determined that the increase of the nanocomponent concentration increases fluorescence intensity of both dyes. It is shown that the fluorescence intensity increases when the wavelength of exciting radiation approaches the maximum of nanoparticles plasmon resonance range. Basing on the received dependences, the conclusion is drawn on existence of nanocomponent optimum concentration, the exceeding of which will lead to suppression of fluorescence due to the increase of probability of nonradiative deactivation of molecules excited states.
?????????????????? ?? ?????????????????????????? ??????????????????????
?????????????????? ?? ?????????????????????????? ??????????????????????
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
