?? ???????????? ?????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ???? ?????????????????? ???? ?????????????????? ?????????????????? GSM 6.10, ???? ???????????????????????????????? ?? ?????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ???????????????. ?? ???????????? ???????????????? ?????????? ???????? ?????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ???????????????????????? ??????????????, ???? ???????????????????????????????? ?? ???????????????? ???????????????? ?????????????????????????? ??????????????, ?? ?????????? ???????????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????????? ???????????? ?????? ?????????????? ???? ?????????????????? ???? ????????????????.

?? ???????????? ?????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ?????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ?? ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????????????????? GSM 6.10, ?????????????????????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????? ????????????. ?? ???????????? ???????????????? ?????????? ???????? ?????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ???????????????? ??????????????, ???????????????????????? ?? ?????????????????????? ???????????????? ?????????????????????????? ??????????????, ?? ?????????? ?????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ?????????????????????? ???????????? ???????? ?????????????? ?? ???????????? ?? ????????????????.

The paper is devoted to the problem of formant tracking methods robustness to GSM 6.10 compression algorithm, which is employed within modern cellular networks. This article describes methods of formant tracking used in modern speaker identification systems. Computational investigation results of these methods robustness to lossy compression are also shown.