publication . Doctoral thesis . 2012

Puzzling with potential: dynamic testing of analogical reasoning in children

Stevenson, Claire Elisabeth;
Open Access English
  • Published: 13 Sep 2012
  • Publisher: Division of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University
  • Country: Netherlands
Assessment procedures are frequent in children's school careers; however, measuring potential for learning has remained a puzzle. Dynamic testing is a method to assess cognitive potential that includes training in the assessment process. The goal of this thesis project was to develop a new dynamic test of analogical reasoning for school children. The main aims were to (1) investigate factors that influence children’s differences in performance and change during dynamic testing and (2) examine the predictive value of dynamic measures on children’s school performance. Children showed great variation in cognitive potential. Higher ability children generally require...
Medical Subject Headings: education
free text keywords: Dynamic testing, Cognitive potential, Learning potential, Educational assessment, Item response theory, Explanatory IRT, Cognitive development, Analogical reasoning, Working memory, Transfer
Related Organizations
Download from
Leiden University Repository
Doctoral thesis . 2012
Provider: NARCIS
57 references, page 1 of 4

Resing, W. C. M., Tunteler, E., De Jong, F., & Bosma, T. (2009). Dynamic testing in indigenous and ethnic minority children. Learning and Individual Di erences, 19(4), 445-450. [OpenAIRE]

Resing, W. C. M., Xenidou-Dervou, I., Steijn, W. M. P., & Elliott, J. G. (2012). A 'picture' of children's potential for learning: Looking into strategy changes and working memory by dynamic testing. Learning and Individual Di erences, 22(1), 144-150. [OpenAIRE]

Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children's development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 249-273. [OpenAIRE]

Rijmen, F., & De Boeck, P. A. L. (2001). Propositional reasoning: the di erential contribution of “rules” to the di culty of complex reasoning problems. Memory and Cognition, 29(1), 165-175.

Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: E ects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 77, 1-15. [OpenAIRE]

Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 17(5), 1-25. [OpenAIRE]

Roth-Van Der Werf, G. J. M., Resing, W. C. M., & Slenders, P. A. C. (2002). Task similarity and transfer of an inductive reasoning training. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 296-325.

Rutland, A., & Campbell, R. (1995). The validity of dynamic assessment methods for children with learning di culties and nondisabled children. Journal of Cognitive Education, 5, 81-94.

Samenjima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. Van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (p. 85-100). New York: Springer.

Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125.

Siegler, R. S. (2002). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (p. 31-58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Siegler, R. S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., Vol. 2, p. 464-510). New York: Wiley and Sons. (W. Damon and R. M. Lerner (Series Editors))

Siegler, R. S., & Svetina, M. (2002). A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: comparing short-term and long-term change. Child Development, 73(3), 793-809.

Sittner Bridges, M., & Catts, H. (2011). The dynamic screening of a phonological awareness to predict risk for reading disabilities in kindergarten children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(4), 330-338.

Speece, D. L., Cooper, D. H., & Kibler, J. M. (1990). Dynamic assessment, individual di erences, and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Di erences, 2, 113-127.

57 references, page 1 of 4
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue