Resing, W. C. M., Tunteler, E., De Jong, F., & Bosma, T. (2009). Dynamic testing in indigenous and ethnic minority children. Learning and Individual Di erences, 19(4), 445-450. [OpenAIRE]
Resing, W. C. M., Xenidou-Dervou, I., Steijn, W. M. P., & Elliott, J. G. (2012). A 'picture' of children's potential for learning: Looking into strategy changes and working memory by dynamic testing. Learning and Individual Di erences, 22(1), 144-150. [OpenAIRE]
Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children's development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 249-273. [OpenAIRE]
Rijmen, F., & De Boeck, P. A. L. (2001). Propositional reasoning: the di erential contribution of “rules” to the di culty of complex reasoning problems. Memory and Cognition, 29(1), 165-175.
Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: E ects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 77, 1-15. [OpenAIRE]
Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 17(5), 1-25. [OpenAIRE]
Roth-Van Der Werf, G. J. M., Resing, W. C. M., & Slenders, P. A. C. (2002). Task similarity and transfer of an inductive reasoning training. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 296-325.
Rutland, A., & Campbell, R. (1995). The validity of dynamic assessment methods for children with learning di culties and nondisabled children. Journal of Cognitive Education, 5, 81-94.
Samenjima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. Van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (p. 85-100). New York: Springer.
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125.
Siegler, R. S. (2002). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (p. 31-58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Siegler, R. S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., Vol. 2, p. 464-510). New York: Wiley and Sons. (W. Damon and R. M. Lerner (Series Editors))
Siegler, R. S., & Svetina, M. (2002). A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: comparing short-term and long-term change. Child Development, 73(3), 793-809.
Sittner Bridges, M., & Catts, H. (2011). The dynamic screening of a phonological awareness to predict risk for reading disabilities in kindergarten children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(4), 330-338.
Speece, D. L., Cooper, D. H., & Kibler, J. M. (1990). Dynamic assessment, individual di erences, and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Di erences, 2, 113-127.