The impact of national cultural distance on the number of foreign web site visits by U.S. households

Article English OPEN
Beugelsdijk, S.; Slangen, A.;
  • Subject:
    mesheuropmc: education

We investigate how national cultural distance, defined as the extent to which the shared values and norms in one country differ from those in another, affect the number of Web site visits. Based on a sample of 2,654 U.S. households visiting Web sites in 38 countries ove... View more
  • References (24)
    24 references, page 1 of 3

    1. Morahan-Martin J. How Internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross cultural review. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2004; 7:497-510.

    2. Hofstede G. (2001[1980]) Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    3. Hu J, Bartneck C. Culture maters: a study on presence in an interactive movie. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2008; 11: 529-35.

    4. Lim KH, Leung K, Sia CL, et al. Is ecommerce boundaryless? Effects of individualism-collectivism and uncertainty avoidance on Internet shopping. Journal of International Business Studies 2004; 35:545-59.

    5. Cho CH, Kang J, Cheon HJ. Online shopping hesitation. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2006; 9:261-74.

    6. Jackson LA, Zhao Y, Qiu W, et al. Cultural differences in morality in the real and virtual worlds: a comparison of Chinese and U.S. youth. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2008; 11:279-86.

    7. Hong M, McClung S, Park Y. Interactive and cultural differences in online newspapers. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2008; 11:505-9.

    8. Kogut B, Singh H. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies 1988; 19:411-32.

    9. Loree DW, Guisinger S. Policy and non-policy determinants of US equity foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies 1995; 26:281-99.

    10. Globerman S, Shapiro DM. Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies 2003; 34:19-39.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark