Indicators of suboptimal performance embedded in the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV)

Article English OPEN
Bouman, Zita ; Hendriks, Marc P.H. ; Schmand, Ben A. ; Kessels, Roy P.C. ; Aldenkamp, Albert P. (2016)
  • Journal: (issn: 1380-3395 1744-411X)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1123226
  • Subject: TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY | MALINGERED NEUROCOGNITIVE | AMERICAN-ACADEMY | logistic regression. | malingering | DIGIT SPAN | RESPONSE BIAS | NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL | DYSFUNCTION | SYMPTOM VALIDITY TESTS | HEAD-INJURY | Assessment | suboptimal performance | effort indicators | RARELY MISSED INDEX | Medicine and Health Sciences | 3RD EDITION
    mesheuropmc: behavioral disciplines and activities

Introduction. Recognition and visual working memory tasks from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) have previously been documented as useful indicators for suboptimal performance. The present study examined the clinical utility of the Dutch version of the WMS-IV (WMS-IV-NL) for the identification of suboptimal performance using an analogue study design.Method. The patient group consisted of 59 mixed-etiology patients; the experimental malingerers were 50 healthy individuals who were asked to simulate cognitive impairment as a result of a traumatic brain injury; the last group consisted of 50 healthy controls who were instructed to put forth full effort.Results. Experimental malingerers performed significantly lower on all WMS-IV-NL tasks than did the patients and healthy controls. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed on the experimental malingerers and the patients. The first model contained the visual working memory subtests (Spatial Addition and Symbol Span) and the recognition tasks of the following subtests: Logical Memory, Verbal Paired Associates, Designs, Visual Reproduction. The results showed an overall classification rate of 78.4%, and only Spatial Addition explained a significant amount of variation (p <.001). Subsequent logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis supported the discriminatory power of the subtest Spatial Addition. A scaled score cutoff of <4 produced 93% specificity and 52% sensitivity for detection of suboptimal performance.Conclusion. The WMS-IV-NL Spatial Addition subtest may provide clinically useful information for the detection of suboptimal performance.
  • References (61)
    61 references, page 1 of 7

    American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology. (2007). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) practice guidelines for neuropsychological assessment and consultation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 209-231. doi:10.1080/ 13825580601025932

    American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Axelrod, B. N., Fichtenberg, N. L., Millis, S. R., & Wertheimer, J. C. (2006). Detecting incomplete effort with Digit Span from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 513-523. doi:10.1080/13854040590967117 (2013).

    Babikian, T., Boone, K. B., Lu, P., & Arnold, G. (2006). Sensitivity and specificity of various digit span scores in the detection of suspect effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 145-159. doi:10.1080/ 13854040590947362

    Bernard, L. C. (1990). Prospects for faking believable memory deficits on neuropsychological tests and the use of incentives in simulation research. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12, 715- 728. doi:10.1080/01688639008401014

    Bortnik, K. E., Boone, K. B., Marion, S. D., Amano, S., Ziegler, E., Cottingham, M. E.,. . . Zeller, M. A. (2010). Examination of various WMS-III logical memory scores in the assessment of response bias. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24, 344-357. doi:10.1080/ 13854040903307268

    Bouman, Z., Hendriks, M. P., Kerkmeer, M. C., Kessels, R. P., & Aldenkamp, A. P. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Dutch version of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV-NL). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 30, 228-235. doi:10.1093/arclin/acv013

    Brennan, A. M., & Gouvier, W. D. (2006). Are we honestly studying malingering? A profile and comparison of simulated and suspected malingerers. Applied Neuropsychology, 13, 1-11. doi:10.1207/ s15324826an1301_1

    Brennan, A. M., Meyer, S., David, E., Pella, R., Hill, B. D., & Gouvier, W. D. (2009). The vulnerability to coaching across measures of effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 314-328. doi:10.1080/ 13854040802054151

    Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Tröster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H.,. . . Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity NAN policy & planning committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 419-426. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark