Attitudes of Dutch Pig Farmers Towards Tail Biting and Tail Docking

Article English OPEN
Bracke, M. B. M. ; De Lauwere, Carolien C. ; Wind, Samantha M. M. ; Zonerland, Johan J. (2013)
  • Publisher: Springer Nature
  • Journal: Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1007/s10806-012-9410-2
  • Subject: Environmental Science(all) | Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) | History | Environmental Chemistry
    mesheuropmc: food and beverages

The Dutch policy objective of a fully sustainable livestock sector without mutilations by 2023 is not compatible with the routine practice of tail docking to minimize the risk of tail biting. To examine farmer attitudes towards docking, a telephone survey was conducted among 487 conventional and 33 organic Dutch pig farmers. “Biting” (of tails, ears, or limbs) was identified by the farmers as a main welfare problem in pig farming. About half of the farmers reported to have no tail biting problems in their own herd. When farmers did report problems, they most often reported figures between 1 and 5 % of the animals. High incidences of tail biting were anticipated when trying to keep undocked pigs. Enrichment materials used in the conventional sector included mainly chains (52–63 % of the farms) and hanging rubber or plastic balls (22–30 %). Straw, sawdust, or wood shavings was hardly provided in conventional pig farming (2–3 %), in contrast to organic farming (88–100 % of farms). Conventional pig farmers feel a curly tail is not very important for sustainable pig farming. They consider enrichment to be less effective and tail docking to be less stressful for them and their piglets than their organic colleagues do. Pig farmers identified climate as a main risk factor for tail biting as opposed to enrichment. The objective of reducing routine tail docking requires solutions for dealing with tail biting problems at the farm level. In this process, transfer of scientific knowledge about enrichment materials and other measures to prevent and cure tail biting is critical, as is a change in farmer attitudes and awareness of the moral issues involved
  • References (39)
    39 references, page 1 of 4

    Bock, B. B., & van Huik, M. M. (2007). Animal welfare: The attitudes and behavior of European pig farmers. British Food Journal, 109, 931-944.

    Bovenkerk, B., Brom, F. W. A., & Van den Bergh, B. (2002). Brave new birds: The use of 'Animal Integrity' in animal ethics. Hastings Center Report, 32, 16-22.

    Bracke, M. B. M. (2008). RICHPIG: A semantic model to assess enrichment materials for pigs. Animal Welfare, 17, 289-304.

    Bracke, M. B. M. (2010). Towards long(er) pig tails: New strategy to solve animal welfare problems. In L. Lidfors, H. Blokhuis, & L. Keeling (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th congress of the ISAE, August 4-7 2010 (p. 135). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers. (Poster, ISAE 2010, Uppsala, Sweden, Aug 4-7).

    Bracke, M. B. M. (Editor) (2011). Verbeteren welzijnsprestaties in de biologische veehouderij: Korte termijn speerpunten en aanzet tot lange termijn visie. (Improving welfare performance in organic farming: Short term priorities and initiation of a long term vision). Report 479. Wageningen Livestock Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands. Accessed 6 Dec 2011. Available at http://edepot.wur.nl/187488.

    Bracke, M. B. M., Hulsegge, B., Keeling, L., & Blokhuis, H. J. (2004). Decision support system with semantic model to assess the risk of tail biting in pigs, 1. Modelling. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 87, 31-44.

    De Lauwere, C., de Rooij, S., & van der Ploeg, J. D. (2007). Understanding farmers' values. In W. Zollitsch, C. Winckler, S. Waiblinger & A. Haslberger (Eds.), Sustainable food production and ethics (pp. 198-203). Preprints of the 7th congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics. EURSAFE 2007, Vienna, 2007.

    De Lauwere, C., Hoogendam, K., Zonderland, J., & Bracke, M. (2009). Stoppen met couperen? Varkenshouders over staartbijten en staartcouperen. LEI rapport 2009-97, LEI, The Haag.

    De Rooij, S. J. G., de Lauwere, C. C., & van der Ploeg, J. D. (2010). Entrapped in group solidarity? Animal welfare, the ethical positions of farmers and the difficult search for alternatives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 12, 341-361.

    Done, S. H., Guise, J., & Chennels, D. (2003). Tail biting and tail docking in pigs. The Pig Journal, 51, 136-154.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark