publication . Part of book or chapter of book . 2011

Net Neutrality and Audiovisual Services

van Eijk, N.; Price, M.E.; Verhulst, S.G.; Morgan, L.;
Closed Access English
  • Published: 01 Jan 2011
  • Publisher: Routledge
  • Country: Netherlands
Abstract
Net neutrality is high on the European agenda. New regulations for the communication sector provide a legal framework for net neutrality and need to be implemented on both a European and a national level. The key element is not just about blocking or slowing down traffi c across communication networks: the control over the distribution of audiovisual services constitutes a vital part of the problem. In this contribution, the phenomenon of net neutrality is described fi rst. Next, the European and American contexts are dealt with. The impact for audiovisual services is sketched in the analysis, including the question of whether net neutrality is a new phenomenon ...
Subjects
free text keywords: Advertising, Business, Phenomenon, Parallels, Law and economics, Net neutrality
Related Organizations
Download fromView all 3 versions
https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/1...
Part of book or chapter of book
Provider: UnpayWall
Universiteit van Amsterdam Digital Academic Repository
Part of book or chapter of book . 2011
Provider: NARCIS
http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780...
Part of book or chapter of book
Provider: Crossref
34 references, page 1 of 3

1) Nico van Eijk is professor in Media and Telecommunications Law at the Institute for Information Law (IViR, University of Amsterdam (http://www.ivir.nl/staff/vaneijk.html )).

2) T. Wu, Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination, 2 J. on Telecomm. and High Tech. L. 141, 2003. (http://www.jthtl.org/content/articles/V2I1/JTHTLv2i1_Wu.PDF; also: http://ssrn.com/abstract=388863).

3) FCC Policy Statement on Network Neutrality FCC 05-151, adopted 5 August 2005.

7) More detailed information about the technical aspects of net neutrality can be found in the following study (Marcus et al, 2011): J. Scott Marcus, P. Nooren, J. Cave & K.R. Carter, Network Neutrality: Challenges and responses in the EU and in the U.S., European Parliament, 2011 (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201105/20110523ATT20073/20110523ATT20073EN.pdf).

8) In 2008 the European Commission started an investigation on the use of DPI technology in the context of behavioural targeting (IP/09/570). More recently, the use of DPI by the Dutch telco-incumbent KPN raised concerns. Nevertheless, DPI seems to be an established practice, also in the context of video distribution (http://www.mspnews.com/news/2010/04/30/4760968.htm).

9) http://www.whatsapp.com/

10) Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) OJ L 108/33 (24 April 2002); Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (Access Directive) OJ L 108/7 (24 April 2002); Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) OJ L 108/21 (24 April 2002); Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) OJ L 108/51 (24 April 2002) and Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications or e-privacy directive) OJ L 201/37 (31 July 2002).

11) Amendments to the Framework Directive and the Universal Service Directive: Directive 2009/136/EC of 25 November 2009, OJ L 337/11 (18 December 2009) (“Citizens' Rights Directive”) and Directive 2009/140/EC of 25 November 2009, OJ L 337/37 (18 December 2009) (“Better Regulation Directive”) .

12) Article 8.4 , sub g, Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive): “(..) The national regulatory authorities shall promote the interests of the citizens of the European Union by inter alia: (..) (g) promoting the ability of end-users to access and distribute information or run applications and services of their choice; (..)”.

13) Citizens' Rights Directive, Recital 28.

18) For example: the Autorité de régulation des Communications électroniques et des postes (ARCEP), “Discussion points and initial policy directions on Internet and network neutrality”, May 2010; Office of Communication (Ofcom), “Traffic Management and 'net neutrality, a Discussion Document”, 24 June 2010. Or more recently, The Autorità per le garanzie nelle comunicazioni (AGCOM), “Delibera 40/11/CONS, Public consultation on Net Neutrality”, 3 February 2011

19) IP/10/860 of 30 June 2010 (“Digital Agenda: Commission launches consultation on net neutrality”). In this contribution we will mainly focus on the first two questions on current problems with net neutrality and on future issues that might arise.

20) The responses can be found here: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/library/public_consult/net_neutrality/comments/index_en.htm

21) European Commission, “Report on the public consultation on 'The open internet and net neutrality in Europe”, 9 November 2010; IP/10/1482 of 9 November 2010 (“Digital Agenda: consultation reveals near consensus on importance of preserving open Internet”).

22) BEREC, Response to the European Commission's consultation on the open internet and net neutrality in Europe, 30 September 2011, document code BoR (10)42.

34 references, page 1 of 3
Powered by OpenAIRE Open Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue
publication . Part of book or chapter of book . 2011

Net Neutrality and Audiovisual Services

van Eijk, N.; Price, M.E.; Verhulst, S.G.; Morgan, L.;