The decision-making process between rationality and emotions

Article English OPEN
Alvino, Letizia ; Franco, Massimo (2017)

The decision-making process has been analyzed in several disciplines (economics, social sciences, humanities, etc.) with the aim of creating models to help decision-makers in strategy formulation. The Organizational theory takes into account both the decision-making process of individuals and groups of a company. Numerous models have been built, which include a wide range of psychological, environmental, hierarchical factors, all of which only account the notion of rationality. In time, such concept has come to be considered pragmatically unrealistic and unachievable. Emotions have recently acquired an increasingly significant position (in the academic and economic society) as important component of the decision making-process. From this point of view neuroscience, the new branch of medical sciences could play a key role in studying individual decision-making processes. This article suggests that thanks to neuroscience it is possible to overcome current limitations in economics studies, for individual’s choices, which are exclusively based on the rational component.
  • References (101)
    101 references, page 1 of 11

    1. Adolphs, R., & Russell, J. A. & Tranel, D. (1999). A Role for the Human Amygdala in Recognizing Emotional Arousal From Unpleasant Stimuli. Psychological Science (http://pss.sagepub.com/), (10), 167-171. http://pss.sagepub.com/content/10/2/167

    2. Anderson, A., & Phelps, E. (2001). Lesions of the Human Amygdala Impair Enhanced Perception of Emotionally Salient Events. Nature, (411), 305-309. http://aclab.human.cornell.edu/publication s/papers/Anderson_Phelps_Nat01.pdf

    3. Bard, P. (1929). The Central Representation of the Sympathetic System. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, (22), 230-246. http://archneurpsyc.jamanetwork.com/artic le.aspx?articleid=644298

    4. Barrett, L. F., & Mesquita, B., & Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2006). The Experience of Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, (58), 373-403. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC1934613/

    5. Bechara, A. (2004) The Role of Emotion in ecision-Making: Evidence from Neurological Patients with Orbitofrontal Damage, Brain and Cognition (http://www.journals.elsevier.com/brainand-cognition), (55), 30-40.

    6. Bechara, A., & Damasio, H. & Antonio R. Damasio (2000). Emotion, Decision Making and the Orbitofrontal Cortex. Celebral Cortex, (10), 295- 307. http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/10 /3/295.full.pdf+html

    7. Bechara, A., & Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (2002). The Somatic Marker Hypothesis and Decision-Making, in Boller, F. & Grafman, J. (eds.). Handbook of neuropsychology: Frontal lobes. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    8. Behling, O. & Eckel, N. (1991). Making Sense Out of Intuition. Academy of Management Executive, (1), 46-54. http://amp.aom.org/content/5/1/46.short

    9. Boucher, J. D., & Ekman, P. (1975). Facial Areas and Emotional Information. Journal of Communication (http://www.jocm.us), (2), 21-29.

    10. Cacioppo, J. T., & Bernston, G. G., & Crites, S. L. (1996). Social Neuroscience: Principles of Psychophysiological Arousal and Response, in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, Higgins, E. T. 6 Kruglanski A. W., New York: Guilford.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark