publication . Other literature type . Article . Preprint . 2015

Classroom reconstruction of the Schwarzschild metric

Kassner, Klaus;
Open Access
  • Published: 10 Sep 2015
  • Publisher: IOP Publishing
Abstract
A promising way to introduce general relativity in the classroom is to study the physical implications of certain given metrics, such as the Schwarzschild one. This involves lower mathematical expenditure than an approach focusing on differential geometry in its full glory and permits to emphasize physical aspects before attacking the field equations. Even so, in terms of motivation, lacking justification of the metric employed may pose an obstacle. The paper discusses how to establish the weak-field limit of the Schwarzschild metric with a minimum of relatively simple physical assumptions, avoiding the field equations but admitting the determination of a single...
Subjects
free text keywords: General Physics and Astronomy, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Related Organizations
53 references, page 1 of 4

1 T. A. Debs and M. L. G. Redhead, “The twin “paradox” and the conventionality of simultaneity,” Am. J. Phys. 64, 384-392 (1996)

2 M. B. Cranor, E. M. Heider, and R. H. Price, “A circular twin paradox,” Am. J. Phys. 68, 1016-1020 (1999)

3 J. P. van der Weele and J. H. Snoeijer, “Beyond the PoleBarn Paradox: How the Pole is Caught,” Nonlinear Phenomena in Complex Systems 10, 271-277 (2007)

4 Moses Fayngold, Special Relativity and Motions Faster than Light (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, Germany, 2002)

5 J. W. Butler, “The Lewis-Tolman Lever Paradox,” Am. J. Phys. 38, 360-368 (1970)

6 E. M. Dewan and M. J. Beran, “Note on stress effects due to relativistic contraction,” Am. J. Phys. 27, 517-518 (1959) [OpenAIRE]

7 J. S. Bell, “How to teach special relativity,” in Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 1993) pp. 67-80, first published in Progress in Scientific Culture 1, 1976

8 P. Ehrenfest, “Gleichfo¨rmige Rotation starrer K¨orper und Relativit¨atstheorie,” Phys. Zeitschrift 10, 918-918 (1909)

9 Ø. Grøn, “Special-Relativistic Resolution of Ehrenfest's Paradox: Comments on Some Recent Statements by T. E. Phipps, Jr..” Found. Phys. 11, 623-631 (1981)

10 K. Kassner, “Spatial geometry of the rotating disk and its non-rotating counterpart,” Am. J. Phys. 80, 772-781 (2012)

11 C. W. Berenda, “The Problem of the Rotating Disk,” Phys. Rev. 62, 280-290 (1942) [OpenAIRE]

12 Ø. Grøn, “Relativistic description of a rotating disk,” Am. J. Phys. 43, 869-876 (1975)

13 J. B. Hartle, “General relativity in the undergraduate physics curriculum,” Am. J. Phys. 74, 14-21 (2006)

14 N. Christensen and T. Moore, “Teaching general relativity to undergraduates,” Physics Today 65(6), 41-47 (2012)

15 A. Sommerfeld, Electrodynamics. Lectures on Theoretical Physics, Vol. III (Academic Press, New York, 1952)

53 references, page 1 of 4
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue