publication . Article . 2017

Nuclear power learning and deployment rates; disruption and global benefits forgone

Peter A. Lang;
Open Access English
  • Published: 01 Dec 2017 Journal: Energies (issn: 1996-1073, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: MDPI AG
This paper presents evidence of the disruption of a transition from fossil fuels to nuclear power, and finds the benefits forgone as a consequence are substantial. Learning rates are presented for nuclear power in seven countries, comprising 58% of all power reactors ever built globally. Learning rates and deployment rates changed in the late- 1960s and 1970s from rapidly falling costs and accelerating deployment to rapidly rising costs and stalled deployment. Historical nuclear global capacity, electricity generation and overnight construction costs are compared with the counterfactual that predisruption learning and deployment rates had continued to 2015. Had ...
free text keywords: nuclear power, construction cost, learning rate, energy transition, disruption, benefits forgone, deaths, CO2 emissions, Technology, T, General Computer Science
Download fromView all 3 versions
Article . 2017
Article . 2017
Provider: Crossref
Provider: UnpayWall
49 references, page 1 of 4

1. Goldemberg, J. Energy, Technology, Development. AMBIO 1992, 21, 14-17.

2. Smil, V. World History and Energy. In Encyclopedia of Energy, 1st ed.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; Volume 6, pp. 549-561.

3. Smil, V. Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects; Praeger: Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 2010; p. 178.

4. Wilson, C.; Grubler, A. Lessons from the History of Technology and Global Change for the Emerging Clean Technology Cluster; International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA): Laxenburg, Austria, 2011. [OpenAIRE]

5. Global Energy Assessment (GEA). Global Energy Assessment-Toward a Sustainable Future; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; The International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis: Laxenburg, Austria, 2012.

6. Gohlke, J.M.; Thomas, R.; Woodward, A.; Campbell-Lendrum, D.; Prüss-Üstün, A.; Hales, S.; Portier, C.J. Estimating the global public health implications of electricity and coal consumption. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 821. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [OpenAIRE]

7. WHO. Ambient and Household Air Pollution and Health. Available online: health_topics/outdoorair/databases/en/ (accessed on 16 September 2017).

8. WHO. Household Air Pollution and Health. Available online: factsheets/fs292/en/ (accessed on 16 September 2017).

9. International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Outlook-Energy Access Database; IEA: Paris, France, 2016.

10. Grübler, A. Technology and Global Change. Chapter 2. In Technology and Global Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003.

11. Alstone, P.; Gershenson, D.; Kammen, D.M. Decentralized energy systems for clean electricity access. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 305-314. [CrossRef] [OpenAIRE]

12. Wilson, C.L. Energy: Global Prospects 1985-000, Report of the Workshop on Alternative Energy Strategies (WAES); McGraw-Hill Book Company: Boston, MA, USA, 1977; p. 291.

13. Rubin, E.S.; Azevedo, I.M.L.; Jaramillo, P.; Yeh, S. A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies. Energy Policy 2015, 86, 198-218. [CrossRef]

14. Lovering, J.R.; Yip, A.; Nordhaus, T. Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors. Energy Policy 2016, 91, 371-382. [CrossRef] [OpenAIRE]

15. Cohen, B. Costs of Nuclear Power Plants-What Went Wrong? In Nuclear Energy Option; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990.

49 references, page 1 of 4
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue