<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Claim

The OpenAIRE Research Community Dashboard: On Blending Scientific Workflows and Scientific Publishing

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Other literature type , Conference object , Part of book or chapter of book 01 Jan 2019 Italy, Portugal Springer International Publishing WT, EC | OpenAIRE-Advance, EC | OpenAIRE-Connect

Authors: Miriam Baglioni; Alessia Bardi; Argiro Kokogiannaki; Paolo Manghi; Katerina Iatropoulou; Pedro Príncipe; André Vieira; +10 Authors

doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-30760-8_5

handle: 1822/62856

The OpenAIRE Research Community Dashboard: On Blending Scientific Workflows and Scientific Publishing

- Summary
- Subjects
- References
  (14)
- Related research
  (2)
- Metrics

Abstract

Despite the hype, the effective implementation of Open Science is hindered by several cultural and technical barriers. Researchers embraced digital science, use “digital laboratories” (e.g. research infrastructures, thematic services) to conduct their research and publish research data, but practices and tools are still far from achieving the expectations of transparency and reproducibility of Open Science. The places where science is performed and the places where science is published are still regarded as different realms. Publishing is still a post-experimental, tedious, manual process, too often limited to articles, in some contexts semantically linked to datasets, rarely to software, generally disregarding digital representations of experiments. In this work we present the OpenAIRE Research Community Dashboard (RCD), designed to overcome some of these barriers for a given research community, minimizing the technical efforts and without renouncing any of the community services or practices. The RCD flanks digital laboratories of research communities with scholarly communication tools for discovering and publishing interlinked scientific products such as literature, datasets, and software. The benefits of the RCD are show-cased by means of two real-case scenarios: the European Marine Science community and the European Plate Observing System (EPOS) research infrastructure.

This work is partly funded by the OpenAIRE-Advance H2020 project (grant number: 777541; call: H2020-EINFRA-2017) and the OpenAIREConnect H2020 project (grant number: 731011; call: H2020-EINFRA-2016-1). Moreover, we would like to thank our colleagues Michele Manunta, Francesco Casu, and Claudio De Luca (Institute for the Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment, CNR, Italy) for their work on the EPOS infrastructure RCD; and Stephane Pesant (University of Bremen, Germany) his work on the European Marine Science RCD.

First Online 30 August 2019

Countries

Italy, Portugal

Related Organizations

National Research Council
Italy
University of Minho
Portugal
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Greece
Institute of Information Science and Technologies "A. Faedo"
Italy
European Organization for Nuclear Research
Switzerland

Subjects by Vocabulary

Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Open science business.industry Process (engineering) Computer science Dashboard (business) Data science Scholarly communication Transparency (behavior) Workflow Publishing business Publication

Keywords

Science & Technology, Scholarly communication, Research infrastructures, Research communities, Open science

14 references, page 1 of 2

1. Artini, M., Atzori, C., Bardi, A., La Bruzzo, S., Manghi, P., Mannocci, A.: The openaire literature broker service for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine 21(11/12), 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1045/november2015-artini

2. Atzori, C., Manghi, P., Bardi, A.: Gdup: De-duplication of scholarly communication big graphs. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM 5th International Conference on Big Data Computing Applications and Technologies (BDCAT). pp. 142{151. IEEE (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/BDCAT.2018.00025

3. Barker, M., Olabarriaga, S.D., Wilkins-Diehr, N., Gesing, S., Katz, D.S., Shahand, S., Henwood, S., Glatard, T., Je ery, K., Corrie, B., Treloar, A., Glaves, H., Wyborn, L., Hong, N.P.C., Costa, A.: The global impact of science gateways, virtual research environments and virtual laboratories. Future Generation Computer Systems 95, 240 { 248 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.12.026

4. Candela, L., Castelli, D., Pagano, P.: D4Science: an e-Infrastructure for Supporting Virtual Research Environments. In: Agosti, M., Esposito, F., Thanos, C. (eds.) Post-proceedings of the Fifth Italian Research Conference on Digital Libraries - IRCDL 2009, Padova, Italy, 29-30 January 2009. pp. 166{169. DELOS: an Association for Digital Libraries / Department of Information Engineering of the University of Padua (2009), http://www.dei.unipd.it/%7Eagosti/ircdl/atti-ircdl2009- nale.pdf

5. Candela, L., Castelli, D., Pagano, P.: Virtual research environments: an overview and a research agenda. Data Science Journal 12, GRDI75{GRDI81 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.GRDI-013

6. De Roure, D.: The future of scholarly communications. Insights 27(3) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.171

7. European Commission: Validation of the results of the public consultation on Science 2.0: Science in Transition. Tech. rep., European Commission (2015), http://ec.europa.eu/research/consultations/science2.0/science 2 0 nal report.pdf

8. European Commission: Open Innovation, Open Science and Open to the World. Tech. rep., European Commission's Directorate-General for Research & Innovation (2016), https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/open-innovationopen-science-open-world-vision-europe

9. Grethe, J.S., Bandrowski, A., Banks, D.E., Condit, C., Gupta, A., Larson, S.D., Li, Y., Ozyurt, I.B., Stagg, A.M., Whetzel, P.L., Marenco, L., Miller, P., Wang, R., Shepherd, G.M., Martone, M.E.: SciCrunch: A cooperative and collaborative data and resource discovery platform for scienti c communities. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics (69) (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.fninf.2014.18.00069

10. Je ery, K.G., Meghini, C., Concordia, C., Patkos, T., Brasse, V., Ossenbruck, J.v., Marketakis, Y., Minadakis, N., Marchetti, E.: A reference architecture for virtual research environments. In: Everything Changes, Everything Stays theSame? Understanding Information Spaces. Proceedings of the 15th InternationalSymposium of Information Science (ISI 2017). pp. 76{88 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18452/1448 [OpenAIRE]

chevron_left
1
2
chevron_right

2 Research products, page 1 of 1

The OpenAIRE Research Community Dashboard: On Blending Scientific Workflows and Scientific Publishing
2019IsPreviousVersionOf
The OpenAIRE Research Community Dashboard: On Blending Scientific Workflows and Scientific Publishing
2019IsPreviousVersionOf

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	1
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Usage byUsageCounts

visibility	views	62
download	downloads	2

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	1
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average