You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Continuing Landscape, Continuing Life: Burial Site of Lahepera in Eastern Estonia
Copyright policy )Continuing Landscape, Continuing Life: Burial Site of Lahepera in Eastern Estonia
The article will comprise a discussion on the continual aspect of landscape based on a burial place in the eastern part of Estonia. This burial place was used for collective dispersed burials into a stone grave from the 3rd to 11th centuries AD. In the second half of the 11th century the burial tradition changed, and from that time on richly furnished inhumations were practiced in the very place next to the stone grave. Previously, I have interpreted such a change in social and religious landscape as a rupture, but it can also be considered as a continuation. The physical landscape remained the same, while new religious rituals (individual inhumations instead of collective cremations) were starting to be practiced at the same location. I will argue that there were various reasons for using this place in the landscape for such a long period of time. The main reason, however, was economic, for the place was probably used as a harbour site. But as practical everyday life was probably closely connected to religious life during that period, I will argue that there was also a religious importance to the place.
- Tallinn University Estonia
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Religious Rituals Archaeology Geography Long period Religious life Ethnology Everyday life Period (music)
Library of Congress Subject Headings: lcsh:Archaeology lcsh:CC1-960
burial site, landscape, landscape; inhumations; cremations; continuation; burial site, cremations, inhumations, continuation, Earth-Surface Processes
burial site, landscape, landscape; inhumations; cremations; continuation; burial site, cremations, inhumations, continuation, Earth-Surface Processes
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Religious Rituals Archaeology Geography Long period Religious life Ethnology Everyday life Period (music)
Library of Congress Subject Headings: lcsh:Archaeology lcsh:CC1-960
3614
in historical geography 36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615818
Cresswell, T 2004 Place, a short introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Ederma, B and Jaik, A 1939 Eesti evangeeliumi luteriusu kirikud. Tallinn.
Gosden, C and Lock, G 1998 Prehistoric histories. World Archaeology 30 (1): 2-12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/004382 43.1998.9980393 [OpenAIRE]
Gumbrecht, H U 2013 After 1945 - Latency as Origin of the Present. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hernández, B, Hidalgo, M C, SalazarLaplace, M E and Hess, S 2007 Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27 (4): 310-319. DOI: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.003
Karro, K 2008 Alatskivi asustuspiirkond rauaajal - kalmed, asulakohad ja linnamäed maastikul (lähemalt vaadatud Lahepera ja Alasoo kalmeid). BA-thesis, Tallinn University.
Karro, K 2010a Kodavere - parish by Lake Peipus. Development of cultural landscape during the Iron Age. Archaeologia Baltica 14: 184-196.
Karro, K 2010b Kodavere - kihelkond Peipsi järve ääres. MA-thesis. Tallinn University.
Karro, K 2012 Lakeside and maritime landscapes: cases of Kodavere settlement district (eastern Estonia) and Pöide settlement district (Saaremaa). Lietuvos archeologija 38: 253-270.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).1 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!- Tallinn University Estonia
The article will comprise a discussion on the continual aspect of landscape based on a burial place in the eastern part of Estonia. This burial place was used for collective dispersed burials into a stone grave from the 3rd to 11th centuries AD. In the second half of the 11th century the burial tradition changed, and from that time on richly furnished inhumations were practiced in the very place next to the stone grave. Previously, I have interpreted such a change in social and religious landscape as a rupture, but it can also be considered as a continuation. The physical landscape remained the same, while new religious rituals (individual inhumations instead of collective cremations) were starting to be practiced at the same location. I will argue that there were various reasons for using this place in the landscape for such a long period of time. The main reason, however, was economic, for the place was probably used as a harbour site. But as practical everyday life was probably closely connected to religious life during that period, I will argue that there was also a religious importance to the place.