
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Committees are the work horses of legislatures. Nevertheless, today we have little solid knowledge of the committee allocation system. To fill this gap, this study on the Austrian Nationalrat (1945-2019) sets out to test distributional, informational, partisan, and gendered theories of committee formation based on a unique panel dataset including 32,202 committee and Members of Parliament (MP) observations. The major insight gained from analyses of 31 different committees is that “who gets what” is determined, first and foremost, by committee experience: In most cases, MPs continue on the same committee once they are assigned to it. Besides this seniority principle, MP´s policy focus and gender have as well a significant impact on the intra-party calculus in allocating seats. It turns out that women are more likely than men to be appointed to low prestige committees regardless of their expertise.
parliamentary committees, committee assignments, panel data, Austria
parliamentary committees, committee assignments, panel data, Austria
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=doi_________::145d0bdf0d0a51fabd798e522fd1a787&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=doi_________::145d0bdf0d0a51fabd798e522fd1a787&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 15 | |
downloads | 25 |