
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Borderlands of Industrial Modernity: Explorations into the History of Technology in Central Asia, 1850-2000.

pmid: 31422962
Borderlands of Industrial Modernity: Explorations into the History of Technology in Central Asia, 1850-2000.
Central Asia is among the world regions that are least explored in terms of their history of technology. This essay reviews a wide array of academic literature that can serve as a base for historical research on technology and material culture in the region. It furthermore explores some of the most promising conceptual avenues for such an endeavor. The metaphor of a borderland, it argues, can be used beyond its geographical meaning to conceptualize the region's technological landscape. This landscape has been shaped by the coexistence of traditional artisanal practices and material cultures, the industrial and architectural legacies of Soviet rule as well as the region's recent reemergence as a hub between Russia, China, Europe, and the Middle East. Based on case studies from different disciplines, this essay therefore discusses technology's role in creating borderlands or territoriality, statehood, production, and everyday life in Central Asia.
- TU Darmstadt Germany
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Middle East Metaphor Modernity media_common.quotation_subject History of technology Economy Political science Comparative historical research China Everyday life media_common Meaning (linguistics)
History, Engineering (miscellaneous)
History, Engineering (miscellaneous)
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Middle East Metaphor Modernity media_common.quotation_subject History of technology Economy Political science Comparative historical research China Everyday life media_common Meaning (linguistics)
106 references, page 1 of 11
Abashin, Sergey. “'Ideal'nyi kolkhoz' v Sovetskoi Srednei Azii: istoriia neudachi ili uspekha?” Acta Slavica Iaponica, no. 29 (2011): 1-26.
_____. Sovetskii kishlak: mezhdu kolonializmom i modernizatsiei. Moscow: NLO, 2015.
Alff, Henryk. “Getting Stuck within Flows: Limited Interaction and Peripheralization at the Kazakhstan-China Border.” Central Asian Survey 35, no. 3 (2016): 369-86.
_____. “Introduction: Beyond Silkroadism: Contextualizing Social Interaction along Xinjiang's Borders.” Central Asian Survey 35, no. 3 (2016): 327-33.
_____. “Profiteers or Moral Entrepreneurs? Bazaars, Traders and Development Discourses in Almaty, Kazakhstan.” International Development Planning Review 37, no. 3 (2015): 249-67.
Andrusz, Gregory D. Housing and Urban Development in the USSR. London: Macmillan, 1984.
Appadurai, Arjun. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.
Bichsel, Christine. “'The Draught Does Not Cause Fear': Irrigation History in Central Asia Through James C. Scott's Lenses.” Revue d'études comparatives Est-Ouest 44, nos. 1-2 (2012): 73-108.
Botoeva, Aisalkyn, and Regine A. Spector. “Sewing to Satisfaction: Craftbased Entrepreneurs in Contemporary Kyrgyzstan.” Central Asian Survey 32, no. 4 (2013): 487-500.
Bray, Francesca. “Flows and Matrices, Landscapes and Cultures.” ICON: Journal of the International Committee for the History of Technology 22 (2016): 8-19.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).7 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).7 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% Powered byBIP!

- Funder: European Commission (EC)
- Project Code: 742631
- Funding stream: H2020 | ERC | ERC-ADG
Central Asia is among the world regions that are least explored in terms of their history of technology. This essay reviews a wide array of academic literature that can serve as a base for historical research on technology and material culture in the region. It furthermore explores some of the most promising conceptual avenues for such an endeavor. The metaphor of a borderland, it argues, can be used beyond its geographical meaning to conceptualize the region's technological landscape. This landscape has been shaped by the coexistence of traditional artisanal practices and material cultures, the industrial and architectural legacies of Soviet rule as well as the region's recent reemergence as a hub between Russia, China, Europe, and the Middle East. Based on case studies from different disciplines, this essay therefore discusses technology's role in creating borderlands or territoriality, statehood, production, and everyday life in Central Asia.