
Background Spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage is the deadliest form of stroke with mortality rates over 50%. Currently, no sufficiently effective treatment to improve both mortality and functional outcome rates exists. However, it seems that minimally invasive surgery, especially endoscopic surgery, might be beneficial in improving survival and functional outcome rates, yet large confirmatory studies thereof are lacking. The aim of this trial is to compare whether early minimally invasive endoscopic surgery leads to improved functional outcome rates compared to the best medical treatment.Methods This is a prospective, parallel-arm, outcome assessor blinded multicenter trial across Switzerland. Endoscopic surgery will be compared to the best medical treatment in a 1:1 randomization over a total time of 12 months. The primary outcome is defined as improved functional outcome (mRS < 3) after 6 months; secondary outcomes include mortality and morbidity rates as well as patient reported outcomes and the temporal evolution of serum biomarkers for brain damage.Discussion Currently, large, randomized trials assessing the role and potential effect of early endoscopic surgery in intracerebral hemorrhage are lacking. Potential practical and methodological issues faced in this trial are patient enrollment, adherence to the hematoma evacuation technique used, potential patient cross-over, and the adaptive Bayesian statistical design. Nonetheless, this trial would be among the first to research the effects of early minimally invasive endoscopic surgery for SSICH and can provide class I evidence for future treatment options in intracerebral hemorrhage.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05681988. Registered on January 3, 2023.
Medicine (General), 616.8, Time Factors, Neuroendoscopy / methods, Humans; Cerebral Hemorrhage/surgery; Cerebral Hemorrhage/mortality; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Switzerland; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Time Factors; Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods; Surgery, Computer-Assisted/adverse effects; Neuroendoscopy/methods; Neuroendoscopy/adverse effects; Bayesian design; Endoscopic surgery; Functional outcome; Intracerebral hemorrhage; Minimally invasive surgery; Patient reported outcome measures; Study protocol, Bayesian design, Study Protocol, R5-920, Minimally invasive surgery, Study protocol, Surgery, Computer-Assisted / methods, Surgery, Computer-Assisted / adverse effects, Humans, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Prospective Studies, Cerebral Hemorrhage / mortality, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Functional outcome, Cerebral Hemorrhage / surgery, Endoscopic surgery, Patient reported outcome measures, Neuroendoscopy / adverse effects, Treatment Outcome, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Neuroendoscopy, Intracerebral hemorrhage, Switzerland
Medicine (General), 616.8, Time Factors, Neuroendoscopy / methods, Humans; Cerebral Hemorrhage/surgery; Cerebral Hemorrhage/mortality; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Switzerland; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Time Factors; Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods; Surgery, Computer-Assisted/adverse effects; Neuroendoscopy/methods; Neuroendoscopy/adverse effects; Bayesian design; Endoscopic surgery; Functional outcome; Intracerebral hemorrhage; Minimally invasive surgery; Patient reported outcome measures; Study protocol, Bayesian design, Study Protocol, R5-920, Minimally invasive surgery, Study protocol, Surgery, Computer-Assisted / methods, Surgery, Computer-Assisted / adverse effects, Humans, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Prospective Studies, Cerebral Hemorrhage / mortality, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Functional outcome, Cerebral Hemorrhage / surgery, Endoscopic surgery, Patient reported outcome measures, Neuroendoscopy / adverse effects, Treatment Outcome, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Neuroendoscopy, Intracerebral hemorrhage, Switzerland
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
